2020
DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of technology‐mediated and in‐person communication on student satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture

Abstract: A direct comparison between technology-mediated and in-person communication and their outcomes is an unexplored research area (Sherman, Michikyan, & Greenfield, 2013). Their repercussion on university students has recently been studied by Sherman et al. (2013) in the context of bonding between friends. This study revealed that students experienced greater bonding when involved in in-person communication. However, future contributions are necessary to provide deeper insights on the impact of technology-based an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major markers of quality doctoral programs and supervisions might include the rates of completions versus attrition per cohort [4], reported quality of mentorship, support and supervision [5][6], quality of student-advisor relationship [7], duration of program completion, reported candidates/students satisfaction [8] quality of research output and publications [9], potential to contribute to the knowledge economy and overall measurable impact of doctoral education on the various walks of life as measurable in terms of innovations, solutions, quality of life and wellbeing. Unfortunately, most of these markers are generally rated between low and poor in many instances in Africa.…”
Section: Quality Of Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major markers of quality doctoral programs and supervisions might include the rates of completions versus attrition per cohort [4], reported quality of mentorship, support and supervision [5][6], quality of student-advisor relationship [7], duration of program completion, reported candidates/students satisfaction [8] quality of research output and publications [9], potential to contribute to the knowledge economy and overall measurable impact of doctoral education on the various walks of life as measurable in terms of innovations, solutions, quality of life and wellbeing. Unfortunately, most of these markers are generally rated between low and poor in many instances in Africa.…”
Section: Quality Of Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These social ties isolate them from real-world interaction and interrupt their actual work by sending text messages, commenting on status, and viewing their recent posting on SNS (Luqman et al, 2017). Social media has a significant positive correlation with the teacher-student relationship (Šerić, 2019, 2020). However, social overload occurs when demands imposed by receptions and maintenance negatively affect users’ health, thereby distracting them from their original task.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%