1995
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444994009261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of temperature on lysozyme crystals. Structure and dynamics of protein and water

Abstract: Lysozyme structures at six different temperatures in the range 95-295 K have been determined using X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 1.7 A. The crystals at lower temperatures had a 7.4% decrease in the unit-cell volume. The volume change was discontinuous with the volume being near 238 000 A, 3 from 295 to 250 K and about 220200 A 3 below 180 K. The thermal expansion of the protein has been analyzed and shows anisotropy, which is correlated with local atomic packing and secondarystructure elements. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
92
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, biomolecules are expected to unfold, not only at high temperature, but also at low temperature (5). In general, it is assumed that such cold denaturation is too slow to intervene during flash-cooling, and this assumption is corroborated by the finding that cryostructures usually differ little from the corresponding room-temperature structures (6)(7)(8)(9). Indeed, in a comparison of 15 protein structures determined both at cryogenic and room temperature, the rms deviation of nonhydrogen backbone atoms in the optimally superimposed structures was only 0.2-0.8 Å (9).…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, biomolecules are expected to unfold, not only at high temperature, but also at low temperature (5). In general, it is assumed that such cold denaturation is too slow to intervene during flash-cooling, and this assumption is corroborated by the finding that cryostructures usually differ little from the corresponding room-temperature structures (6)(7)(8)(9). Indeed, in a comparison of 15 protein structures determined both at cryogenic and room temperature, the rms deviation of nonhydrogen backbone atoms in the optimally superimposed structures was only 0.2-0.8 Å (9).…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…This fact is probably widely appreciated within the crystallography community, although rarely stated explicitly. With a few notable exceptions (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), it is usually taken for granted that the cryostructure is quenched at ambient temperature (T* ϭ T 0 in our notation) and, therefore, that the only structural effect of the low temperature is to sharpen the atomic displacement distributions without significantly displacing the mean atomic positions [apart from a more-or-less uniform contraction of the protein (6-9)]. In contrast to this conventional wisdom, the present analysis indicates that many degrees of freedom are quenched at temperatures near 200 K, where local conformational and association equilibria may be strongly shifted toward low-enthalpy states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was thus possible to make a calibration of the X-ray properties of ground-grown crystals to compare them with spacegrown ones using identical conditions except the level of gravity. The reasons for the choice of hen egg-white lysozyme as a model protein were multiple: the structure of lysozyme is known at high resolution (Madhusudan, Kodandapani & Vijayan, 1993;Harata, 1994;Pike & Acharya, 1994;Kurinov & Harrison, 1995), it is easily available in gram quantities, it crystallizes in a time span compatible with the duration of a US Shuttle flight, its phase diagram on earth is known at various temperatures (Ataka & Asai, 1988;Howard, Twigg, Baird & Meehan, 1988;Guilloteau, Ri~s-Kautt & Ducruix, 1992), and it is one of the most extensively studied proteins in crystallogenesis (Feher & Kam, 1985;Ataka & Asai, 1988;Ri~s-Kautt & Ducruix, 1989;Mikol, Hirsch & Giegr, 1990;DeMattei & Feigelson, 1992;Monaco & Rosenberger, 1993;Forsythe & Pusey, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, several other protein structures have been studied at more temperature points and in a broader temperature range from 80 to 300 K (Singh et al, 1980;Hartmann et al, 1982;Parak et al, 1987;Tilton et al, 1992;Kurinov & Harrison, 1995;Nagata et al, 1996;Teeter et al, 2001;Joti et al, 2002;Edayathumangalam & Luger, 2005;Schmidt et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2009). Crystallographic B factors (Debye-Waller factors) can also provide some insights into protein dynamics.…”
Section: Protein Structures At Various Cryo-temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%