2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of temporal spacing on time-place discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rats had been trained using study and test times that were separated by a small (2 min) delay. Because this delay is too small for rats to discriminate based on a circadian oscillator (Pizzo and Crystal 2004), we increased the delay between study and test to 7 hr (see Figure 1c), which is a value likely to be discriminated based on a circadian oscillator (Pizzo and Crystal 2006). Importantly, when we first introduced the long delay between study and test, the time of day at test was unfamiliar (approximately 7 hr later than usual) whereas the time of day at study was familiar from earlier training.…”
Section: Remembering the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rats had been trained using study and test times that were separated by a small (2 min) delay. Because this delay is too small for rats to discriminate based on a circadian oscillator (Pizzo and Crystal 2004), we increased the delay between study and test to 7 hr (see Figure 1c), which is a value likely to be discriminated based on a circadian oscillator (Pizzo and Crystal 2006). Importantly, when we first introduced the long delay between study and test, the time of day at test was unfamiliar (approximately 7 hr later than usual) whereas the time of day at study was familiar from earlier training.…”
Section: Remembering the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the introduction, there are three likely possibilities: circadian, ordinal, and a nontiming alternation strategy. (However, see Pizzo & Crystal, 2006, for an argument for the use of interval timing in some daily TPL tasks.) To determine which type of timer was being used, skip session probes were conducted.…”
Section: Memory Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we used a phase shift of light onset in the colony (24,25) to determine whether the rats used time of day (i.e., circadian phase) or an interval cue (i.e., the interval since light onset) to find their second helpings (Experiment 2). Under conditions in which predictions for circadian time of day and an interval cue were dissociated, we observed revisits to the chocolate location based on circadian time of day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%