2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreases of the contact stress and minimum principal stress on the non-deviated side were also greater than those on the deviated side under the 2 occlusions. Both the simulated results and clinical cases suggested BSSRO could improve the asymmetric stress distributions, especially reducing the stresses at the non-deviated sides in accordance with the previous study by Qi et al [ 31 ] Thus, the patients with TMD but without serious maxillofacial deformity could recover by changing the biomechanical environment of TMJs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decreases of the contact stress and minimum principal stress on the non-deviated side were also greater than those on the deviated side under the 2 occlusions. Both the simulated results and clinical cases suggested BSSRO could improve the asymmetric stress distributions, especially reducing the stresses at the non-deviated sides in accordance with the previous study by Qi et al [ 31 ] Thus, the patients with TMD but without serious maxillofacial deformity could recover by changing the biomechanical environment of TMJs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the 3D finite element method was used to investigate the stress distribution of the closing and opening muscle groups of the jaw after BSSRO. [ 31 ] The results indicated that the significant differences of stress distributions between the patients with mandibular prognathism and healthy subjects had disappeared after BSSRO. However, these studies only considered the force or stress distributions of condyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, achieving this level is dependent on defining such a standard first, and ideally using a validated performance assessment tool. Most reported instruments for condylar segment repositioning performance assessment, such as cephalometric analysis [ 31 ], CT [ 5 ], cone beam CT (CBCT) [ 32 , 33 ], and finite element analysis [ 34 ], can capture position aspects, but only in post-operative conditions. The CPS appears to be an efficient intra-operative learning tool that is completely safe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have emphasized in this study the importance of the condyle position during BSSO but we highlight the influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of the jaw on the stress distribution in the condyles with changing jaw position after BSSO with condylar resorption consequence [ 34 , 46 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%