2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the hippocampus and declarative memory on word use: Patients with amnesia use less imageable words

Abstract: Hippocampal functioning contributes to our ability to generate multifaceted, imagistic event representations. Patients with hippocampal damage produce event narratives that contain fewer details and fewer imagistic features. We hypothesized that impoverished memory representations would influence language at the word level, yielding words lower in imageability and concreteness. We tested this by examining language produced by patients with bilateral hippocampal damage and severe declarative memory impairment, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the young participants in this study produced very few semantic details, near floor levels ( M = 3.8, SD = 1.99), precluding our ability to properly assess the dissociation between episodic and semantic details, as in other studies (Hodgetts et al, ). Moreover, in the present study, we cannot rule out the possibility that the association between our purported measurement of episodic AM and hippocampal subregions simply reflects linguistic aspects of narrative construction or production (e.g., see Duff & Brown‐Schmidt, ; Hilverman, Wagner Cook, & Duff, ), although some lesion work suggests that while the hippocampus is required for autobiographical memory, it is not required for producing a detailed narrative (Race, Keane, & Verfaellie, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the young participants in this study produced very few semantic details, near floor levels ( M = 3.8, SD = 1.99), precluding our ability to properly assess the dissociation between episodic and semantic details, as in other studies (Hodgetts et al, ). Moreover, in the present study, we cannot rule out the possibility that the association between our purported measurement of episodic AM and hippocampal subregions simply reflects linguistic aspects of narrative construction or production (e.g., see Duff & Brown‐Schmidt, ; Hilverman, Wagner Cook, & Duff, ), although some lesion work suggests that while the hippocampus is required for autobiographical memory, it is not required for producing a detailed narrative (Race, Keane, & Verfaellie, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, instructing these patients to use visual imagery strategies impaired both high and low imagery word pair performance (Jones-Gotman, 1979). More recently, detailed examination of the language use of patients with bilateral hippocampal damage showed that the patients used fewer high imagery words when producing verbal narratives compared to both healthy controls and patients with damage elsewhere in the brain (Hilverman et al, 2017), supporting a link between the hippocampus and word imageability. In addition, higher than expected word pair performance has been found in amnesic patients for highly semantically related word pairs in comparison to unrelated word pairs of the kind that are usually employed in VPA tasks (Shimamura & Squire, 1984;Winocur & Weiskrantz, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It could be that people use visual imagery when processing the word pairs (Maguire & Mullally, 2013). This speculation has recently received indirect support from the finding that patients with hippocampal amnesia used significantly fewer high imagery words in their narrative descriptions of real and imagined events (Hilverman, Cook, & Duff, 2017), suggesting a potential link between verbal processing and visual imagery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the passage of time affected the use of language in narrative recollections is relevant to earlier studies describing abnormalities in language use by memory-impaired patients with hippocampal lesions. For example, reports that patients used fewer definite articles (20), higher-frequency words (21), and words with lower imageability (21) may reflect how patients typically speak when memory is weak and lacks detail. This idea was proposed by the earlier authors, and the present findings support it by showing directly that the use of language by memory-impaired patients matched in many respects the use of language by volunteers whose memory was weak as a result of being tested after a long delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have described situations where hippocampal patients use language differently than healthy volunteers (19). For example, hippocampal patients have been reported to use fewer definite articles in their discourse (20), higher-frequency words, and words with lower imageability (21) and to exhibit poorer narrative coherence (i.e., poorer continuity and organization in narratives) (22,23). These irregularities in the use of language could reflect impaired cognitive functions other than memory that are supported by the hippocampus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%