2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(01)00432-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the magnetic field on the crystallisation form of calcium carbonate and the testing of a magnetic water-treatment device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments were also performed in the laboratory to investigate the magnetic effects on CaCO 3 nucleation and crystal growth via a more systematic approach; however, conflicting results also exist in the literature. For example, the magnetic field would suppress (Dalas and Koutsoukos, 1989;Kobe et al, 2001), accelerate (Higashitani et al, 1993;Barrett and Parsons, 1998), or have no effect (Duffy, 1977;Hasson and Bramson, 1985) on the CaCO 3 growth, thus creating a widespread controversy as to the credibility of this type of water conditioning, such as the conclusion of Herzog et al (1989) that the effectiveness of a magnetic water treatment device was attributed to the contamination of solution by Fe ions, which dissolved from the device and inhibited the build-up of scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experiments were also performed in the laboratory to investigate the magnetic effects on CaCO 3 nucleation and crystal growth via a more systematic approach; however, conflicting results also exist in the literature. For example, the magnetic field would suppress (Dalas and Koutsoukos, 1989;Kobe et al, 2001), accelerate (Higashitani et al, 1993;Barrett and Parsons, 1998), or have no effect (Duffy, 1977;Hasson and Bramson, 1985) on the CaCO 3 growth, thus creating a widespread controversy as to the credibility of this type of water conditioning, such as the conclusion of Herzog et al (1989) that the effectiveness of a magnetic water treatment device was attributed to the contamination of solution by Fe ions, which dissolved from the device and inhibited the build-up of scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional drawback of some reported studies was measuring the deposit rate of scales on the pipe wall, which took a long time to collect any data, probably several weeks or months (Kobe et al, 2001). Recently, Tai et al (2008) investigated the effect of a magnetic field on the calcite growth rate in a constant-composition environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 10 min of settling time was required to reach a maximal removal rate for different algae densities. The magnetic water treatment device has been applied in the practical water treatment (Kobea et al 2001;Smith et al 2003;Patent US4888113). This integration of nano-Fe 3 O 4 and PACl provides a potential application for fast algal removal of algae in reservoirs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When water temperature increases, the solubility of calcium carbonate decreases (Young I. Cho et al, 2005;Coetzee, Yacoby, Howell, & Mubenga, 1998) and when dissolved or suspended minerals precipitate they are attracted to the membrane surface due to their natural charges (Bisbee, 2003;Thompson et al, 2012) and form crystals (Kobe, Dražić, McGuiness, & Stražišar, 2001). Scaling results in permeate flux decline and crystals can damage the active membrane layer (Valavala, Sohn, Han, Her3, & Yoon, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%