The Influence of the Selection at the Amino Acid Level on Synonymous Codon Usage from the Viewpoint of Alternative Genetic Codes

Abstract

Synonymous codon usage can be influenced by mutations and/or selection, e.g., for speed of protein translation and correct folding. However, this codon bias can also be affected by a general selection at the amino acid level due to differences in the acceptance of the loss and generation of these codons. To assess the importance of this effect, we constructed a mutation–selection model model, in which we generated almost 90,000 stationary nucleotide distributions produced by mutational processes and applied a selection based on differences in physicochemical properties of amino acids. Under these conditions, we calculated the usage of fourfold degenerated (4FD) codons and compared it with the usage characteristic of the pure mutations. We considered both the standard genetic code (SGC) and alternative genetic codes (AGCs). The analyses showed that a majority of AGCs produced a greater 4FD codon bias than the SGC. The mutations producing more thymine or adenine than guanine and cytosine increased the differences in usage. On the other hand, the mutational pressures generating a lot of cytosine or guanine with a low content of adenine and thymine decreased this bias because the nucleotide content of most 4FD codons stayed in the compositional equilibrium with these pressures. The comparison of the theoretical results with those for real protein coding sequences showed that the influence of selection at the amino acid level on the synonymous codon usage cannot be neglected. The analyses indicate that the effect of amino acid selection cannot be disregarded and that it can interfere with other selection factors influencing codon usage, especially in AT-rich genomes, in which AGCs are usually used.

Genetic diversity of Metarhizium sp. isolated from various hosts in East Dumoga, North Sulawesi, Indonesia

“…Nucleotide base substitution occurs due to mutations; the mutations found were synonymous point mutations. According to Pawlak et al (2023), this mutation did not cause a change in the amino acid it codes for. This happened because a type of amino acid had several variations in the codon code.…”