2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11628-015-0272-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the source and valence of word-of-mouth information on post-failure and post-recovery evaluations

Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to better understand the impact that wordof-mouth recommendations (WOM) source (i.e., personal vs. impersonal sources) and WOM valence (average vs. excellent) have on satisfaction and trust following a failure and recovery event. Our results showed that customers who received WOM recommendations from personal rather than impersonal sources (WOM source) were less dissatisfied with the organization when severe versus mild failures occurred. Likewise, failure severity had less negati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although WOM was originally studied in the 1960s, there has been a significant increase in academic investigation in retail in recent years (e.g. Kumar et al , 2013; Riquelme et al , 2016; Hess and Ring, 2016; Vesma et al , 2016). There are different definitions of the WOM concept.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Model Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although WOM was originally studied in the 1960s, there has been a significant increase in academic investigation in retail in recent years (e.g. Kumar et al , 2013; Riquelme et al , 2016; Hess and Ring, 2016; Vesma et al , 2016). There are different definitions of the WOM concept.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Model Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pre-purchase stage individuals seek information as a risk reduction strategy (King et al , 2014). In the post-purchase stage, consumers engage in WOM with a variety of motivations, mainly to help other consumers, prevent possible errors, vent their anger or reduce cognitive dissonance (Kim and Gupta, 2012; Eisingerich et al , 2014; Hess and Ring, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Model Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the factors consumers consider in their decision-making processes is word-of-mouth (WOM), defined as 'informal, person-to-person communication between a perceived noncommercial communicator and a receiver regarding a brand, product, an organization, or a service' (Harrison-Walker 2001, p.63). The importance of WOM has long been a relevant topic for marketing researchers and practitioners (Gruen et al 2006) because customers often rely on word-of-mouth recommendations to influence many types of purchase decisions (Hess and Ring 2015).…”
Section: The Importance Of Electronic Word-of-mouth (Ewom)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eWOM received post-purchase allows consumers to reform their perception of the consumed product/service, thereby influencing switching behaviour (Wangenheim and Bayón, 2004). Further, Hess and Ring (2016) assert that the valence of WOM information about a service provider received in the post-failure stage affects consumers' satisfaction and trust towards that service provider. Additionally, eWOM information received in the post-purchase stage has been found to influence consumers' eWOM-giving behaviour (Liu and Keng, 2014), triggered by comparison as a social need of consumers (Alexandrov et al, 2013;Choi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Social Comparison In Ewommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…<Insert Figure 1 here> More precisely, unlike the pre-purchase stage where consumers have limited knowledge and experience about the product/service, consumers have acquired their own consumption experience by the time they encounter online reviews in the post-purchase stage (Carù and Cova, 2003); thus, making the online review reception post-purchase fundamentally different from pre-purchase stages. The involvement of personal consumption experiences creates new dynamics in post-purchase evaluation, together with online review information received (Hess and Ring, 2016). Such new dynamics allow consumers to compare their own experiences with eWOM information on the review sites in which others' experiences with the same company are being shared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%