2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9303-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive effects can be found in the levels of learning and in the results obtained by students (Leung & Lee, 2012;López-Pérez, Pérez-López, Rodríguez-Ariza, & Argente-Linares, 2013;Markovíc & Jovanovíc, 2012;Mohd & Maat, 2013). There are also studies where no incidence of technology has been found on learning outcomes (Wittwer & Senkbeil, 2008) or negative effects when problems of addiction are present that constitute a social problem (Chou, Condron, & Belland, 2005;Kim, LaRose, & Peng, 2009), having as a consequence the decrease of the student's academic performance (Junco & Cotten, 2011;Kubey, Lavin, & Barrows, 2001).…”
Section: Technology and Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive effects can be found in the levels of learning and in the results obtained by students (Leung & Lee, 2012;López-Pérez, Pérez-López, Rodríguez-Ariza, & Argente-Linares, 2013;Markovíc & Jovanovíc, 2012;Mohd & Maat, 2013). There are also studies where no incidence of technology has been found on learning outcomes (Wittwer & Senkbeil, 2008) or negative effects when problems of addiction are present that constitute a social problem (Chou, Condron, & Belland, 2005;Kim, LaRose, & Peng, 2009), having as a consequence the decrease of the student's academic performance (Junco & Cotten, 2011;Kubey, Lavin, & Barrows, 2001).…”
Section: Technology and Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, such F2F lectures have remained unchanged leaving learners passive recipients, and online activities have not engaged learners as intended (Arum and Roska 2011;Garrison and Kanuka 2004). Many researchers have critiqued that such a mix achieves neither the tremendous benefit of effective human interaction in the classroom nor the advantages of online systems and technological affordances for individualized pacing and flexible access to learning resources (Huon et al 2007;López-Pérez et al 2013;Lou et al 2006;Orton-Johnson, 2009). The current improper mix of blended learning activities, then, calls for a better blend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging middle school classroom curriculum is also crucial because students often become disinterested in their education during the early years of adolescence, resulting in students who are not properly prepared to succeed in high school and beyond (Balfanz & Mac Iver, 2000). The use of technology, such as a mobile application, in educational settings also has positive impacts on students' content knowledge, attitudes towards technology, motivation and task engagement, as well as higher order thinking (Brown, 2007;Eyyam & Yaratan, 2014;Lòpez-Pèrez, Pèrez-Lòpez, Rodrìguez-Ariza, & Argente-Linares, 2013). Likewise, field trips to cultural institutions produce positive effects on visitors, such as higher recall and increased interest in science careers, encouraging disenfranchised learners to identify as scientists, improving critical thinking, and increasing connections to content (Behrendt & Franklin, 2014;Dierking & Falk, 1997;Greene, Kisida, & Bowen, 2014;Naizer, 1993;Rahm & Ash, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%