2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-011-0142-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of thinning on rainfall interception by Pinus pinea L. in Mediterranean coastal stands (Castel Fusano—Rome)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, EW in the stand with the lower tree density was also positively and significantly correlated with summer precipitation. This result suggest that trees are able to utilize a greater amount of water reaching the soil during the summer months, due to low interception loss because of the presence of gaps within the canopy cover (Mazza et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, EW in the stand with the lower tree density was also positively and significantly correlated with summer precipitation. This result suggest that trees are able to utilize a greater amount of water reaching the soil during the summer months, due to low interception loss because of the presence of gaps within the canopy cover (Mazza et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…trees in closed stands were found to be more prone to water shortage than pines in open woodlands (Moreno-Gutiérrez et al 2012). In a Pinus pinea L. pinewood in central Italy, the net under-canopy precipitation was always found to be greater in a thinned stand than in an unthinned stand, especially for low precipitation amounts, because of the greater interception by the tree canopy (Mazza et al 2011). This pattern was observed especially for the dry summer months, when the net under-canopy precipitation in the unthinned area decreased by nearly 23%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main results showed that canopy interception represents 12.4 to 39.6% of total precipitation (Chapter three - Table 4 Similar effects are also reported in other thinning studies (Swank et al 1989;Mazza et al 2011, Slodicak et al, 2011.…”
Section: -The Hydrological Balance After Thinningsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Mazza et al, (2011) found an increase of 11.7% of net precipitation (throughfall+stemflow) in the thinned area compared to control area. However, stemflow measurements were very low, comprising only 0.20% of the total precipitation in the thinned area and 0.27% in the control.…”
Section: Interception Throughfall and Stemflowmentioning
confidence: 81%