2014
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2014.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of time on the magnetic properties of late Quaternary periglacial and alluvial surface and buried soils along the Delaware River, USA

Abstract: Magnetic susceptibility of soils is a common proxy for rainfall, but other factors can contribute to magnetic enhancement in soils. Here we explore influence of centuryto millennial-scale duration of soil formation on periglacial and alluvial soil magnetic properties by assessing three terraces with surface and buried soils ranging in exposure ages from <0.01 to ∼16 kyrs along the Delaware River in northeastern USA. The A and B soil horizons have higher X lf , Ms, and S-ratios compared to parent material, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference soil samples CX1 and CX2 were associated with clusters “c” and “e” and were collected in the A and B horizons from a Haplic Cambisol in a dry forest environment. A dry forest is a vegetation community that hosts frequent natural fires, and the data prove the capacity of wildfire to produce magnetic signatures in the natural soil, as previously shown by Ketterings et al (2000) and Stinchcomb and Peppe (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Reference soil samples CX1 and CX2 were associated with clusters “c” and “e” and were collected in the A and B horizons from a Haplic Cambisol in a dry forest environment. A dry forest is a vegetation community that hosts frequent natural fires, and the data prove the capacity of wildfire to produce magnetic signatures in the natural soil, as previously shown by Ketterings et al (2000) and Stinchcomb and Peppe (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%