2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:fire.0000003313.97677.c5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Tunnel Geometry and Ventilation on the Heat Release Rate of a Fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For illustration purposes, velocities of 1 m/s, 1.5 m/s and 3 m/s were performed similar to ventilation velocities that might be expected from a tunnel smoke control system and Figure 11d indicates there is an increase in the peak heat release rate as the air velocity in the tunnel increases similar to previous experimental observations [18,19]. The total simulated energy release at 3 m/s was found to be 257 GJ compared with the theoretical 247 GJ experimental value (Table 1).…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For illustration purposes, velocities of 1 m/s, 1.5 m/s and 3 m/s were performed similar to ventilation velocities that might be expected from a tunnel smoke control system and Figure 11d indicates there is an increase in the peak heat release rate as the air velocity in the tunnel increases similar to previous experimental observations [18,19]. The total simulated energy release at 3 m/s was found to be 257 GJ compared with the theoretical 247 GJ experimental value (Table 1).…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Observations from the EUREKA [18] fire experiments and studies by Carvel et al [19] have shown that ventilation condition, tunnel geometry, fuel configuration and even the location of ignition can affect the burning characteristics of a fire. The effect on the simulated fire growth of these parameters and the FDS representation of the Runehamar tunnel experiment T1 were investigated as part of the computational analysis.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data were used to produce a probability distribution of fire size for heavy goods vehicles (HGV), cars and a range of pool fire sizes [12]. The peak HRR in a tunnel is established from an equation in the form of [13]:…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…j is presented as probability percentile graphs which vary depending on the type of fuel burning. According to Carvel et al [13], the probability distribution for j are categorised into HGVs, medium sized pool fires and large pool fires ( Figure 1). For example, 50% of all fires have a j value of 4 at 4 m/s for HGV fires.…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domestic and foreign scholars have conducted a lot of research on the smoke flow characteristics of tunnel fire under different fire heat release rate and ventilation mode. Carvel, R. O. et al summarized the fire tests and simulated the influence of tunnel geometry and ventilation wind speed on the growth of fire heat release rate coefficient [2] . Li, Y Z et al researched the influence of the height and width of tunnel section and ventilation velocity on the heat release rate of liquid oil pool fire and solid fuel fire through model experiment [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%