2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of uncertainty in the development of a CO2 infrastructure network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially important if the ethics management mechanisms are not established. The identification of key evaluation criteria and recommendations in the site evaluation process should provide clear inputs for costs-risks-investment business decisions[150]. Studies on site-selection and -evaluation criteria for CO2 storage in geological formations have highlighted that the main criteria to be considered are geological, geothermal, geohazards, hydrodynamic, hydrocarbon potential and basin maturity, and economic, societal, and environmental issues[36,[151][152][153][154][155][156].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important if the ethics management mechanisms are not established. The identification of key evaluation criteria and recommendations in the site evaluation process should provide clear inputs for costs-risks-investment business decisions[150]. Studies on site-selection and -evaluation criteria for CO2 storage in geological formations have highlighted that the main criteria to be considered are geological, geothermal, geohazards, hydrodynamic, hydrocarbon potential and basin maturity, and economic, societal, and environmental issues[36,[151][152][153][154][155][156].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many uncertainties in CCUS system [32][33][34], such as storage potentials. Their impact on the pipeline layout could be significant and the uncertainty analysis is needed in order to improve reliability and practicability of the pipeline network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field F7.4 (67 papers, 31% of C7) explored optimisation models for CO 2 transport. Key papers included Fimbres and Wiley [159] (d = 140), who, after reviewing several CCS network optimisation methodologies, proposed to start with determining the characteristics of a near-optimal CCS pipeline network by taking a whole systems approach to the minimum total cost per tonne of CO 2 avoided in a "steady-state"; Knoope et al [160] (d = 127), who modelled a transportation network under uncertainty using a real option approach (ROA), and without uncertainty, using a perfect foresight (PF) model; and Mechleri et al [161] (d = 110), who presented an optimisation methodology for the "right-size" CO 2 transport infrastructure, by taking into account the future variability in CO 2 flow (including periods of zero flow) due to an increasing share of renewables, and therefore a reduced load of fossil fuel-fired power plants.…”
Section: Cluster C5 (Pink 255 Nodes 6%)-the Chemistry Of Capture Anmentioning
confidence: 99%