2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of unilateral disc displacement on stress in the contralateral joint with a normally positioned disc in a human temporomandibular joint: An analytic approach using the finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the contact force is distributed over all interpenetrating vertices, which again changes between meshes. The complexity of this problem is supported by the fact that previous models of the human masticatory system did not include a mesh independent grid analysis (Koolstra and van Eijden, 2005; Mori et al, 2010; Commisso et al, 2014, 2015; Hattori-Hara et al, 2014; Martinez Choy et al, 2017). Additionally, the purpose of the presented model and the large amount of uncertainty in measured parameters of the jaw region will permit a larger amount of error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the contact force is distributed over all interpenetrating vertices, which again changes between meshes. The complexity of this problem is supported by the fact that previous models of the human masticatory system did not include a mesh independent grid analysis (Koolstra and van Eijden, 2005; Mori et al, 2010; Commisso et al, 2014, 2015; Hattori-Hara et al, 2014; Martinez Choy et al, 2017). Additionally, the purpose of the presented model and the large amount of uncertainty in measured parameters of the jaw region will permit a larger amount of error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this set up allows researchers to compute more realistic force patterns of the joint, simulations often solely focus on the TMJ itself; neglecting or drastically simplifying the dentition as well as muscle force calculations. Additionally, due to the high computational cost of these models, typically static- or quasi-static simulations are performed (Mori et al, 2010; Commisso et al, 2014; Hattori-Hara et al, 2014). However, tasks that are most likely to create high forces in the joint, like mastication or tooth grinding, have important dynamic characteristics and hence cannot be appropriately modeled using a static or quasi-static set-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biomechanical models of human masticatory system are powerful tools for evaluating the biomechanical microenvironment in the TMJ. Previously many researchers have attempted to develop two-dimensional or threedimensional TMJ models for simulation and animation of the TMJ motion and stress analysis in the TMJ during masticatory function without invasive approach (22,(55)(56)(57)(63)(64)(65)(66). With a revolution in computer science, the models have been in reality simulations including fourdimensional simulation.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 2–4% of the U.S. population are estimated to seek treatment for temporomandibular symptoms [1]. Accurate description of temporomandibular morphometry is critical for clinical diagnosis and surgical planning, design and development of regenerative scaffolds and prosthetic devices [26], and to accurately model temporomandibular stresses and strains, contact mechanics, and nutrient environment [79]. However, discrepancies in reported temporomandibular morphometry between measurement techniques results in controversy surrounding the real size and shape of temporomandibular components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%