1983
DOI: 10.1080/07351698309533518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of values in psychoanalysis: The case of female psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are all familiar with the early challenges to the concept of penis envy by Horney (1933) and Thompson (1964) and the more recent criticisms of a male-oriented view of psychodynamics by Baker-Miller (1985), Moulton (1970), Notman (1982), and Person (1983). These analysts have questioned the classical analyst's views of women.…”
Section: Male and Femalementioning
confidence: 93%
“…We are all familiar with the early challenges to the concept of penis envy by Horney (1933) and Thompson (1964) and the more recent criticisms of a male-oriented view of psychodynamics by Baker-Miller (1985), Moulton (1970), Notman (1982), and Person (1983). These analysts have questioned the classical analyst's views of women.…”
Section: Male and Femalementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Others have offered more specific criticisms. The overemphasis on the dyadic relationship as a closed system is criticized by some authors, including Karasu (1990), and the patriarchal bias, inadequate conception of gender and age stereotyping in psychodynamic theory is discussed in Person (1983) and Eichenbaum and Orbach (1983). Within occupational therapy, perhaps the most noted critic of psychodynamic models is Gary Kielhofner (1983;.…”
Section: The Use Of Creative Arts Within Psychodynamic and Humanisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After examining the various contributions on analytic neutrality and its relationship with countertransference (Bion, 1959(Bion, , 1962Grinberg, 1956Grinberg, , 1963Grunberger, 1973;Heimann, 1950, Hinshelwood, 1999Hoffer, 1985;Jacobs, 1999;Joseph, 1965Joseph, , 1983Kernberg, 1965Kernberg, , 1975Kernberg, , 1976Kernberg, , 1990Leider, 1984;Little, 1951;Loewald, 1960;Makari, 1997;Meissner, 1993;Michels and Oldam, 1983;MoneyKyrle, 1956;Person, 1963;Pick, 1989;Ramzy, 1965;Reich, 1951;Sandler, 1976;Segal, 1977;Schafer, 1983;Shapiro, 1984;Winnicott, 1947;Wolf, 1993), I will expose the way I now visualize this concept. This may amount to another attempt to find a useful version of it, but after my revision, the conviction of its importance and centrality in the analytic attitude became stronger.…”
Section: Psychoanalytic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%