The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants

Abstract

A variety of internal and external factors influence speech perception performance following cochlear implantation (CI) in adult deaf patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the speech perception performance during repetition testing according to various factors and to identify the predictive factors associated with postoperative speech perception. The performances on speech perception under audio-only conditions were examined over time in 61 adult patients with CI. Mono- and bi-syllable and sentence repetition testing, using both the Korean version of the Central Institute for the Deaf (K-CID) and the K-Western Aphasia Battery test (K-WAB), were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. To elucidate the effect that the etiology of deafness has on postoperative outcome, patients were divided into the following four groups: Prelingual hearing loss (HL) (n = 9), Meningitis (n = 6), Progressive HL (n = 31) and Sudden HL groups (n = 15). Moreover, the duration of HL and deafness was defined as follows: (1) "age of deafness onset: AoD", (2) "number of years between the onset of profound deafness and CI: DoD" and (3) "percentage of the patient's life with moderate-to-profound hearing loss before CI: PoL". DoD and PoL were significantly different between the four groups. Although AoD appeared to be associated with performance on the sentence repetition test before standardizing for education level and age (P = 0.015), there was no association after adjusting for these factors (P = 0.719). Only PoL showed a good correlation with performance on repetition testing after CI after adjusting for AoD and DoD. However, DoD was associated with speech perception performance on the sentence repetition test only. In addition, speech perception performance results in the Progressive and Sudden HL groups were improved over the Prelingual HL and Meningitis groups. The Meningitis group showed the poorest speech perception performance among postlingually deaf adults. Consideration of age, education level, etiology and overall time with hearing loss may be necessary for predicting speech perception outcomes in CI recipients.

Statistical Analysis of Various Factors Affecting the Results of Cochlear Implantation

“…The average duration of deafness for postlingual adults was 3.12±2.23, with a median of 2.00 and an interquartile range of 2.00 in years and a significant direct linear relation with auditory threshold conduction thresholds. These results agree with the results of Moon et al [5] and Holden et al [6] on deaf adults, who also found Table 9. Results of Kruskal-Wallis test for effect of causes over the outcomes that shorter durations of deafness were associated with better performance postimplantation.…”

“…Other studies had a similar incidence of causes of sensorineural hearing loss in children [5,11] . Intraoperative events occurred in 9.7% of children of our study and had no statistical significant effect on the outcome.…”

Cochlear implantation in late childhood and adolescence: is there such a thing as ‘too late’?

“…The device that converts acoustic energy into electrical stimulation bypassing endogenously dysfunctional cochlear structures has gained widespread popularity in the aural rehabilitation of patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The performance of patients following cochlear implantation can be broadly variable, dependent on a number of factors, including age of onset of deafness, duration of deafness, age of implantation, etiology of deafness, use of hearing aids, mode of communication, cognitive ability, motivation and psychosocial support system to name a few [1][2][3][4].…”

Desempenho auditivo ao longo do tempo em usuários de implante coclear com perda auditiva pós-lingual

“…In patients with post-lingual hearing loss, the use of the Cochlear Implant (CI) seeks the restoration of the auditory perception and the verbal communication (1) . The auditory results obtained by individuals with post-lingual hearing loss has been of great interest, once that the previous auditory experience allows the evaluation of the auditory performance before and after the cochlear implant and, therefore, determine the achieved benefits with the usage of the device (2) .…”