2023
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of viral protein R amino acid substitutions on clinical outcomes in people living with HIV: A systematic review

Abstract: Background:The HIV viral protein R (Vpr) is a multifunction protein involved in the pathophysiology of HIV-1. Recent evidence has suggested that Vpr amino acid substitutions influence the pathophysiology of HIV-1 and clinical outcomes in people living with HIV (PLWH). Several studies have linked Vpr amino acid substitutions to clinical outcomes in PLWH; however, there is no clear consensus as to which amino acids or amino acid substitutions are most important in the pathophysiology and clinical outcomes in PLW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this review, we applied a criterion for identifying ‘noteworthy’ markers as done previously. 17 , 25 For a marker (gene transcript/protein) to be noteworthy it had to be (1) investigated by three or more (>2) independent studies and (2) >50% of the studies investigating the marker had to report a consistent direction in their association with NCI/HIVE. In other words, if >50% of studies that investigated a particular marker found it to have the same direction in association with CI/HIVE, it was considered a noteworthy marker for future investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For this review, we applied a criterion for identifying ‘noteworthy’ markers as done previously. 17 , 25 For a marker (gene transcript/protein) to be noteworthy it had to be (1) investigated by three or more (>2) independent studies and (2) >50% of the studies investigating the marker had to report a consistent direction in their association with NCI/HIVE. In other words, if >50% of studies that investigated a particular marker found it to have the same direction in association with CI/HIVE, it was considered a noteworthy marker for future investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we considered the frequency a marker was investigated when contextualising the findings. For this review, we applied a criterion for identifying ‘noteworthy’ markers as done previously 17,25 . For a marker (gene transcript/protein) to be noteworthy it had to be (1) investigated by three or more (>2) independent studies and (2) >50% of the studies investigating the marker had to report a consistent direction in their association with NCI/HIVE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations