1980
DOI: 10.3758/bf03198830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of vision on the absolute identification of sound-source position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the brain resolves a discrepancy in spatial information provided by the auditory and visual systems by altering sound localization to match visual localization (Shelton and Searle, 1980;Warren et al, 1982). Also, in both cases there is a limit to the angular discrepancy that can be overcome: ap- proximately 20" for prism rearing in barn owls, and approximately 30" for visual capture in humans (Jackson, 1953;Thurlow and Rosenthal, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the brain resolves a discrepancy in spatial information provided by the auditory and visual systems by altering sound localization to match visual localization (Shelton and Searle, 1980;Warren et al, 1982). Also, in both cases there is a limit to the angular discrepancy that can be overcome: ap- proximately 20" for prism rearing in barn owls, and approximately 30" for visual capture in humans (Jackson, 1953;Thurlow and Rosenthal, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crossmodal spatial interaction of visual and acoustic stimuli could have occurred, resulting in a visual bias of sound localization (see, e.g., Lewald et al, 2001;Lewald & Guski, 2003;Shelton & Searle, 1980;Warren, 1970). Moreover, the visual stimulus could have cued the spatial position where the acoustic target would have been located at the moment of tactile stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the luminance of the visual reference indicated the point in time when the target position had to be judged. Thus, it is possible that auditory-visual crossmodal interactions, in particular a visual bias of the sound localization (the so-called ventriloquism effect), were superimposed over potential genuine auditory effects (see, e.g., Lewald, Ehrenstein, & Guski, 2001;Lewald & Guski, 2003;Shelton & Searle, 1980;Warren, 1970). Another critical factor in Mateeff and Hohnsbein's study is the potential influence of different perceptual latencies of the auditory event (the moving acoustic target) and the visual event (the increase in luminance of the visual reference).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, sound localization in the MP is best for sources in the front and worst for sources that are above ear level or in the rear (e.g., Noble & Gates, 1985;Shelton & Searle, 1980; for a review, see Wightman & Kistler, 1993).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%