2022
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of wearing a mask on the projected first impressions and attractiveness levels of smiling individuals

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of mask wearing on facial attractiveness and projected first impressions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods A total of eight models were evaluated by 200 live raters and 750 online raters both with and without masks while smiling maximally. Both live and online raters looked at the models for 15 s, then completed a first impressions questionnaire. Results Overall ratings for attractiveness were higher for both masked and unmasked conditions in‐person versus online. Males wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these estimation errors are relatively modest, other studies have reported a larger range of errors of up to 20 years older or younger than actual age (Dayan et al, 2015;Fink et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these estimation errors are relatively modest, other studies have reported a larger range of errors of up to 20 years older or younger than actual age (Dayan et al, 2015;Fink et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Specifically, photographs of faces depicting 40 and 50‐year‐old women are perceived on average 1.5 years younger when wearing full makeup, while 20‐year‐old women appear 1.4 years older with identical makeup (Russell et al, 2019). Although these estimation errors are relatively modest, other studies have reported a larger range of errors of up to 20 years older or younger than actual age (Dayan et al, 2015; Fink et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%