2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of wet/dry treatment on pore structure-the correlation of pore parameters, water retention and moisture regain values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Relationships among the WRV, Hydrogen Bond Models, and Supramolecular Structure of Deinked Fibers The Water Retention Value (WRV) is a general measure of fiber swelling capacity (Jayme 1958). According to previous research, the hydrogen bond models and cellulose supramolecular structure (crystalline structure) greatly influence the WRV (Kongdee et al 2004;Khantayanuwong et al 2002b;Page and Tydeman 1963;Weise and Paulapuro 1999). For instance, with increasing recycling times, the decrease in the WRV might have been due to the formation of irreversible hydrogen bonds in the cellulose fibrils of the fibers, or to irreversible aggregation of cellulose microfibrils, or perhaps both factors (Matsuda et al 1994;Wistara and Yong 1999;Hult et al 2001).…”
Section: Changes Of the Content Of Polymorphs And Cellulose Fibril Agmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Relationships among the WRV, Hydrogen Bond Models, and Supramolecular Structure of Deinked Fibers The Water Retention Value (WRV) is a general measure of fiber swelling capacity (Jayme 1958). According to previous research, the hydrogen bond models and cellulose supramolecular structure (crystalline structure) greatly influence the WRV (Kongdee et al 2004;Khantayanuwong et al 2002b;Page and Tydeman 1963;Weise and Paulapuro 1999). For instance, with increasing recycling times, the decrease in the WRV might have been due to the formation of irreversible hydrogen bonds in the cellulose fibrils of the fibers, or to irreversible aggregation of cellulose microfibrils, or perhaps both factors (Matsuda et al 1994;Wistara and Yong 1999;Hult et al 2001).…”
Section: Changes Of the Content Of Polymorphs And Cellulose Fibril Agmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…15 The porous structure in ND changes with drying treatment, resulting in collapse of pores, and ND loses its large accessibilities of water and chemical substances. 16 The NSF and SF are ND fiber-dried, without and with spin-finishing. This means that NSD and SF were dried totally twice when they were treated with polym1, while ND was dried once.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] In essence, the material of interest is packed in a chromatography column to act as the stationary phase and probe molecules (substances of known molecular size that have no affinity for the material) are eluted through the column in a mobile phase. The pore parameters (total pore volume, pore surface area, and pore size) are derived from the elution profiles.…”
Section: Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%