2018
DOI: 10.1002/lno.10957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influences of nitrogen form and zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton assemblages in two coastal southeastern systems

Abstract: Coastal environments are vulnerable to land development due to human population growth that has increased nitrogen and phosphorus loading into receiving estuaries. As a result, phytoplankton blooms have proliferated as “bottom‐up” (resource) processes outweigh “top‐down” (removals). This study investigated phytoplankton biomass and assemblage regulation by both N‐form (ammonium, nitrate, urea) and zooplankton at two southeastern United States estuaries (the urban Charleston Harbor and less‐developed Ashepoo‐Co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(210 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates varied seasonally in the estuary and were highest in the summer, which is consistent with seasonal trends found in temperate and high latitude waters (Kim et al, 2007;Calbet et al, 2008;Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al, 2011;Lawrence and Menden-Deuer, 2012). The magnitude of grazing rates presented here (0-2.11 day −1 ) are similar to previous estimates from the region (southeast United States; Murrell et al, 2002;Wetz et al, 2006;Sitta et al, 2018) and support the role of microzooplankton as important consumers in subtropical systems. Seasonal differences were also observed in the ratio of growth to grazing, resulting in either negative or positive accumulation of plankton biomass.…”
Section: Seasonal Variability In Ratessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates varied seasonally in the estuary and were highest in the summer, which is consistent with seasonal trends found in temperate and high latitude waters (Kim et al, 2007;Calbet et al, 2008;Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al, 2011;Lawrence and Menden-Deuer, 2012). The magnitude of grazing rates presented here (0-2.11 day −1 ) are similar to previous estimates from the region (southeast United States; Murrell et al, 2002;Wetz et al, 2006;Sitta et al, 2018) and support the role of microzooplankton as important consumers in subtropical systems. Seasonal differences were also observed in the ratio of growth to grazing, resulting in either negative or positive accumulation of plankton biomass.…”
Section: Seasonal Variability In Ratessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(PO 4 and SiO 4 ) were either stable over the year or in high enough concentrations to support growth (Verity and Borkman, 2010;Bittar et al, 2016). Furthermore, cases of nitrogen limitation are common in the Skidaway River Estuary (Verity, 2002a) and many other southeastern United States estuaries (Howarth and Marino, 2006;Sitta et al, 2018), which supports the nitrate-limiting system we observed. During the summer, environmental conditions improved (e.g., increased temperature, sunlight, and nutrients), which likely contributed to estimates of positive accumulation rates.…”
Section: Seasonal Variability In Ratessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Zooplankton play a mediating role in the food web of aquatic ecosystems, and excess zooplankton puts predation pressure on phytoplankton (Boyce et al, 2010; De Stasio et al, 2018; Sitta et al, 2018). When zooplankton biomass is low, phytoplankton will proliferate rapidly (Paerl et al, 2011; Er et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen is one of the most important nutrients regulating the primary production of phytoplankton, which are grazed by zooplankton (Bristow et al 2017;Sitta et al 2018). In the study area, nitrate (NO 3 − ), i.e.…”
Section: Nutrients and Chlorophyll-αmentioning
confidence: 99%