2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The information content of capacity utilization for detrending total factor productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Student mean tests indicate that their mean is zero over the estimation period, confirming the stability in the relationship between the CUR and the TFP gap. Like Planas et al (2013), but in a different framework, we find that including the CUR in our TFP model improves the quasi-real-time reliability 10 of TFP gap estimates. We iteratively estimate the TFP equation over samples going from a fixed start date to a rolling end date.…”
Section: Robustness and Quasi-real-time Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Student mean tests indicate that their mean is zero over the estimation period, confirming the stability in the relationship between the CUR and the TFP gap. Like Planas et al (2013), but in a different framework, we find that including the CUR in our TFP model improves the quasi-real-time reliability 10 of TFP gap estimates. We iteratively estimate the TFP equation over samples going from a fixed start date to a rolling end date.…”
Section: Robustness and Quasi-real-time Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Statistically, this variable also has a number of features that make it extremely valuable from a practical point of view: (1) the CUR is observable and available for many countries, which facilitates international comparisons (see the EU harmonized Business Tendency Surveys); (2) CUR surveys are rapidly available (generally at the beginning of the following month); and (3) the CUR is not revised. By focusing on capacity utilization, our approach builds heavily on Planas et al (2013) but in a trendstationary framework à la Perron (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue was discussed in Orphanides and Van Norden () or Planas et al . () and is closely related to the problem of revision strategy for seasonally adjusted figures. Many NSIs continuously revise their official releases of seasonally adjusted series, since estimates of seasonal effects can be improved as new information becomes available.…”
Section: Model Selection and Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also do not directly deal with intangible capital(Corrado et al, 2012). However, we do use the latest release of the EU KLEMS dataset, which makes some efforts to deal with this latter issue.5The major difference between their approach and BFK is thatBurnside et al (1995) assume a unit elasticity between changes in hours per worker and capital utilization, while BFK estimate this elasticity.6Planas et al (2013) propose a statistical filtering method to extract trend TFP growth for European countries (also relying on capacity utilization surveys). This approach differs from BFK and from our paper by the fact that it uses a statistical model instead of the economic structure imposed by a cost minimization model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%