2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.899409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Information Content of Stock Split Announcements: Do Options Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the number of statistically significant factors in credit spreads is difficult to estimate, most papers find two or three factors. 14 To be conservative, we use the first five factors as capturing systematic variation in credit spreads with a total R 2 of 93.9%.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the number of statistically significant factors in credit spreads is difficult to estimate, most papers find two or three factors. 14 To be conservative, we use the first five factors as capturing systematic variation in credit spreads with a total R 2 of 93.9%.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we study the effect options listings have on the stock price response of firms added to the S&P 500 index. In this respect, our study is related to that of Chern et al (2008) who find that the announcement of a stock split conveys less new information to the market for a stock that is optioned than for one that is not. However, we document an insignificant relation between options listings and abnormal returns associated with S&P 500 index inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Bhushan (1994) uses the stock price as a proxy for direct trading costs, and dollar trading volume as a proxy for the inverse of direct trading costs. Chern et al (2008) hypothesize that heavily traded stocks are more liquid and more informationally efficient. We use the logarithm of the stock's trading volume (TRADING), measured as the mean trading volume between event days −100 and −21 relative to the S&P 500 inclusion announcement date, scaled by common shares outstanding, and the closing stock price 21 days before the announcement (PRC) to proxy for trading costs and liquidity.…”
Section: Accounting For Risk and Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chern, Tandon, Yu, & Webb (2008) hold that a higher run-up leads to lower abnormal returns, whereas Leledakis, Papaioannou, Travlos, & Tsangarakis (2009), in an explanation compatible with the momentum effect, argue the opposite as the run-up would reflect expectations of higher future profits. In our sample, the market reacts positively to splits with both high and low run-ups, and although abnormal returns on the announcement day are higher in the first group, there is no clear pattern in the cumulative abnormal returns on the following days.…”
Section: Price Reaction To Split Announcementsmentioning
confidence: 99%