1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2530469.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface − erosion model

Abstract: Introduction of a novel method for the quantification of the cellobiose released made it possible to follow the initial stage of hydrolysis of bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC) by cellobiohydrolases 1,4-β-D-glucan-cellobiohydrolase I (CBH I) and 1,4-β-D-glucan-cellobiohydrolase II (CBH II) from Trichoderma reesei. A drastic retardation of the rate of the hydrolysis was observed already at a very low degree of conversion. Earlier-suggested retardation factors, such as product inhibition by cellobiose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
122
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
11
122
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among such phenomena are effects of high enzyme loading, including competitive or synergistic adsorption of cellulase components (Jeoh et al, 2002;Kyriacou et al, 1989;Ryu et al, 1984), as well as implications of incorporating a substrate material balance distinguishing between free and total substrate sites (Lynd et al, 2002). Further phenomena relevant in this context include changes in F a and perhaps other substrate properties during the course of hydrolysis (Ooshima et al, 1990;Valjamae et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 1999), as well as product inhibition (Gong et al, 1977;Holtzapple et al, 1990;Hong et al, 1981;Ladisch et al, 1980Ladisch et al, , 1981, substrate inhibition (Fenske et al, 1999;Hong et al, 1981;Huang and Penner, 1991;Valjamae et al, 2001), and cellulase deactivation and/or unproductive binding (Kadam et al, 2004;Valjamae et al, 2001). A model that meaningfully incorporates random adsorption, active-and inactive-adsorbed species, and dependence upon the availability of chain ends is an important objective for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among such phenomena are effects of high enzyme loading, including competitive or synergistic adsorption of cellulase components (Jeoh et al, 2002;Kyriacou et al, 1989;Ryu et al, 1984), as well as implications of incorporating a substrate material balance distinguishing between free and total substrate sites (Lynd et al, 2002). Further phenomena relevant in this context include changes in F a and perhaps other substrate properties during the course of hydrolysis (Ooshima et al, 1990;Valjamae et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 1999), as well as product inhibition (Gong et al, 1977;Holtzapple et al, 1990;Hong et al, 1981;Ladisch et al, 1980Ladisch et al, , 1981, substrate inhibition (Fenske et al, 1999;Hong et al, 1981;Huang and Penner, 1991;Valjamae et al, 2001), and cellulase deactivation and/or unproductive binding (Kadam et al, 2004;Valjamae et al, 2001). A model that meaningfully incorporates random adsorption, active-and inactive-adsorbed species, and dependence upon the availability of chain ends is an important objective for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, an increase of enzyme concentration produces a higher density of cellulase on the crystalline surface, and these bound molecules may interfere with the ability of the CD of other enzyme molecules to capture a single cellulose chain. Since CBH is adsorbed on the surface of the substrate only via CBD, but not via both CD and CBD, this is called non-productive binding, because no hydrolytic product is formed by these molecules (14). Therefore, there is an optimum amount of adsorbed enzyme on the surface of cellulose.…”
Section: B Hydrolysis Of Crystalline Cellulose By Cellobiohydrolasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily due to the limitations of the assay methods that have been employed, most of the previous enzymecellulosic substrate interaction studies have used purified enzymes or reconstituted mixtures of purified enzymes [15,16] and/ or model substrates such as pure cellulose or substrates with a very low lignin content [17,18] to simplify the subsequent enzyme assays and analyses. While these studies have advanced our understanding of enzymes-substrate interaction, they have not looked at the interactions occurring during the hydrolysis of an industrially relevant lignocellulosic substrate using a complete enzyme mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%