2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The initial wave induced failure of silty seabed: Liquefaction or shear failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the maximum stress angle under the linear wave is 31.6 • , which is around the critical value, 31 • . As shown in figure 20, shear failure may occur near the water-seabed interface in the deceleration phase, which is consistent with Ren et al (2020).…”
Section: Wave-induced Shear Failure Potential Inside the Seabedsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results show that the maximum stress angle under the linear wave is 31.6 • , which is around the critical value, 31 • . As shown in figure 20, shear failure may occur near the water-seabed interface in the deceleration phase, which is consistent with Ren et al (2020).…”
Section: Wave-induced Shear Failure Potential Inside the Seabedsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From the Phase I to Phase III, the erosion constant was increased dramatically with the help of the wave (or swell) process (Table 1). The reason for explaining this increasing process can be attributed to the bed liquefaction due to the wave process (Lambrechts et al, 2010;Ren et al, 2020). From the Phase III to the Phase IV, the calibrated erosion constant was increased up to 2×10 -4 kg/m 2 /s under the exclusive deposition paradigm while the calibrated erosion constant under the simultaneous deposition paradigm was remained unchanged, with the value of 2×10 -4 kg/m 2 /s.…”
Section: Performance Of Runs With Different Deposition Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Brandon et al [29] demonstrated that static pressure and vibration significantly impact the density of field silt. Phan et al [30] employed drained and undrained triaxial tests on sandy soils to reveal that liquefaction resistance improves with increased rolling resistance of fines [31,32]. Thevanayagam and Martin [33] performed field liquefaction and laboratory permeability tests on silt, indicating that the water content and compaction degree affect both the collapse rate and permeability coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%