1997
DOI: 10.1080/713752559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inner Eye and the Inner Scribe of Visuo-spatial Working Memory: Evidence from Developmental Fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

22
230
1
21

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
22
230
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, behavioral measures of WM systems improve substantially between the ages of 5 and 9 years (Gathercole, Pickering,may fractionate through development from early childhood to adolescence or early adulthood. Indeed, Logie and Pearson (1997) suggested that the systems for visuospatial WM are fractionated to a greater extent in children aged 8 to 9 years than in those aged 5 to 6 years, and Gathercole et al (2004) showed that the modular structure of WM is present from 6 years of age, but is not present in 4-year-olds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, behavioral measures of WM systems improve substantially between the ages of 5 and 9 years (Gathercole, Pickering,may fractionate through development from early childhood to adolescence or early adulthood. Indeed, Logie and Pearson (1997) suggested that the systems for visuospatial WM are fractionated to a greater extent in children aged 8 to 9 years than in those aged 5 to 6 years, and Gathercole et al (2004) showed that the modular structure of WM is present from 6 years of age, but is not present in 4-year-olds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the steady increase across the childhood years in scores on tests of visuospatial short-term memory that use material that is not phonologically recodable is not as yet fully understood (e.g., Pickering, Gathercole, Hall, & Lloyd, 2001). One possibility is that the developmental increases reflect changes in the storage capacity of the visuospatial sketchpad per se (Logie & Pearson, 1997). Alternatively, they may relate to other age-related changes such as increasingly effective deployment of strategies, accumulating long-term knowledge relating to visuospatial structures, or increased support by the central executive (see Pickering, 2001, for a review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although spatial and visual information was initially considered to be processed by a single VSSP system, subsequent neuropsychological studies have indicated the need to distinguish between visual and spatial STM (Della Sala, Gray, Baddeley, Allamano, & Wilson, 1999;Pickering, Gathercole, Hall, & Lloyd, 2001). Logie and colleagues (1995;Logie & Pearson, 1997) suggested a fractionation of the sketchpad into two subcomponents: a visual cache (temporary visual storage) and an inner scribe (retrieval and a rehearsal -3 -mechanisms; analogous to the articulatory rehearsal of the PL). Dynamic (e.g., Corsi Block Test) and static (e.g., Visual Patterns Test) span tasks are typically used to measure spatial and visual memory, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%