2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1581-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inner quality of an article: Will time tell?

Abstract: In this paper, we assess whether quality survives the test of time in academia by comparing up to 80 years of academic journal article citations from two top journals, Econometrica and the American Economic Review. The research setting under analysis is analogous to a controlled real world experiment in that it involves a homogeneous task (trying to publish in top journals) by individuals with a homogenous job profile (academics) in a specific research environment (economics and econometrics). Comparing articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of changing writing style in terms of text length is well investigated in various disciplines. For example, various studies in the informetrics and scientometrics literature report a significantly positive relation between scientific article length and citation outcome (see [ 6 ], [ 7 ], [ 8 ], [ 9 ], [ 10 ]). On the other hand, short and succinct abstracts are more likely to increase citations than longer abstracts [ 11 ].…”
Section: Text Length and Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of changing writing style in terms of text length is well investigated in various disciplines. For example, various studies in the informetrics and scientometrics literature report a significantly positive relation between scientific article length and citation outcome (see [ 6 ], [ 7 ], [ 8 ], [ 9 ], [ 10 ]). On the other hand, short and succinct abstracts are more likely to increase citations than longer abstracts [ 11 ].…”
Section: Text Length and Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peer-review process remains critical in preventing unworthy papers from being published even if they cite a large number of key papers. Chan et al (2015) note that the quality of the scientific contribution of a work can be biased due to factors such as institutional affiliation and the time of publication. Therefore, the eigenvector centrality metric identifies papers that are reachable from other key papers, but it does not serve as an absolute metric on the quality of identified Big Fish papers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the geography and quality of institutions are related as most prestigious institutions are either in North America or Europe. Chan et al (2015) find that authors from high-ranking institutions get more citations for their Econometrica and AER publications, and Amara et al (2015) find that authors from high-ranking Canadian business schools receive more citations than authors from low-ranking Canadian business schools. However, authors from top institutions do not necessarily receive more citations in all academic fields.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%