2015
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1114320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The INNs and outs of antibody nonproprietary names

Abstract: An important step in drug development is the assignment of an International Nonproprietary Name (INN) by the World Health Organization (WHO) that provides healthcare professionals with a unique and universally available designated name to identify each pharmaceutical substance. Monoclonal antibody INNs comprise a –mab suffix preceded by a substem indicating the antibody type, e.g., chimeric (-xi-), humanized (-zu-), or human (-u-). The WHO publishes INN definitions that specify how new monoclonal antibody ther… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Under the 2014 INN/WHO method for assigning generic names, rozanolixizumab was given the -xizu- sub-stem, designating it a chimeric/humanized molecule; the chimeric designation was assigned due to sequence similarities with Macaque monkey IgG sequences, however, no Macaque monkey sequences were used in the humanization process. This designation has been criticized and used as an example in the literature to show some of the inaccuracies and inconsistencies with the INN/WHO system; 33,34 the naming system has subsequently been revised and superseded. 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Under the 2014 INN/WHO method for assigning generic names, rozanolixizumab was given the -xizu- sub-stem, designating it a chimeric/humanized molecule; the chimeric designation was assigned due to sequence similarities with Macaque monkey IgG sequences, however, no Macaque monkey sequences were used in the humanization process. This designation has been criticized and used as an example in the literature to show some of the inaccuracies and inconsistencies with the INN/WHO system; 33,34 the naming system has subsequently been revised and superseded. 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Indeed a number of 1D 1 H NMR based methods have been recently proposed for chemometric HOS analysis of mAbs. 3,4,1315 The application of chemometric approaches to the problem of 2D spectral analysis of protein therapeutics is less well-established, but is actively being explored. Proposed approaches include direct point-to-point linear correlation analysis of the processed data matrix, 16 spectral covariance analysis, 17 multivariate principal component analysis on both the processed data matrix, 18,19 as well as on tables of peak positions and intensities, 5 spectral distance metrics such as nearest neighbor approaches on peak tables, 20 and total spectral Euclidian deviation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting percentage of human residues in Vk, identified by IMGT/ DomainGapAlign, is 90.5»92.3%, which is comparable to approved fully human antibodies and qualifies the name "-umab" according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) International Nonproprietary Name (INN) definitions; whereas the percentage of human residues in VH is 77.8»83.8%, which is similar to the currently approved humanized antibodies (-zumab), but is less than 85% and could also fall into the "chimeric" category (-ximab). 38 To further reduce the immunogenicity, one can consider removing T-cell epitopes 8,39,40 from the grafted combined Kabat/IMGT/Paratome CDRs, where it is the major immunogenic site that we have seen in humanized murine antibodies. 8 Anti-mesothelin immunotoxins have been developed for clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%