2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The insightful water quality analysis and predictive model establishment via machine learning in dual-source drinking water distribution system

Huiping Li,
Baiqin Zhou,
Xiaoyan Xu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with previous studies. 36,37 Similarly, DOC (2.0%) and pH (0.3%) were negatively correlated with THMs, but their effects were not as signicant as residual chlorine. The impact of water quality parameters on THMs varied across different sections of the water supply pipeline; for instance, pH, DOC, SUVA, and UV 254 displayed a negative association with THMs in WDS, whereas turbidity (the explain value only reached 0.1%) exhibited a positive correlation with THMs (Table 3).…”
Section: Proposed Model At the Junction Of Dual-source Dwdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with previous studies. 36,37 Similarly, DOC (2.0%) and pH (0.3%) were negatively correlated with THMs, but their effects were not as signicant as residual chlorine. The impact of water quality parameters on THMs varied across different sections of the water supply pipeline; for instance, pH, DOC, SUVA, and UV 254 displayed a negative association with THMs in WDS, whereas turbidity (the explain value only reached 0.1%) exhibited a positive correlation with THMs (Table 3).…”
Section: Proposed Model At the Junction Of Dual-source Dwdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the range of SHAP values in the GBDT-based SHAP plot is much larger than that in the SVM-based and DT-based SHAP plot. Previous studies [80,81] also acquired further explanations to avoid the disadvantages of the "black box" of ML models. This may be one of the reasons why the GBDT-based model is more accurate that the other models in this study.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Fluorescent Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%