2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The insulin resistant subphenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical parameters and pathogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive correlation was shown between androgens and insulin levels in the NC-CAH group. This correlation has also been demonstrated in many studies with PCOS patients [30,31,32] with or without body mass excess. Not many studies were found in the literature investigating NC-CAH patients on this aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A positive correlation was shown between androgens and insulin levels in the NC-CAH group. This correlation has also been demonstrated in many studies with PCOS patients [30,31,32] with or without body mass excess. Not many studies were found in the literature investigating NC-CAH patients on this aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Different studies have reported different prevalence rates of insulin resistance in women with PCOS. Whereas some investigators have suggested that insulin resistance is universal in these women [13], others are of the opinion that it is present in no more than 40% to 70% of cases [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Till date, the mechanisms of CC resistance in women with PCOS remain unclear. Elevated of testosterone [14] and IR [15] have been reported as predictive factors in CC-resistant PCOS. Ellakwa et al [16] promoted that a combination of patient amenorrhea, BMI, total testosterone, AMH, ovarian volume, ovarian stromal artery pulsatility index, and visceral fat area could be used to predict CC treatment response, but thyroid function was not referred in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%