1986
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(86)90053-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intake and digestibility by sheep of oat straw and maize stover offered with different levels of noug (Guizotia abyssinica) meal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for T2, the result of this study is comparable with the findings of Butterworth and Mosi (1985) that reported a 29% increase in total DM intake when NSM was used as a supplement in tef straw based feeding of sheep. The improvement in total DM intake in the supplemented animals could be attributed to better supply of CP that promoted the proliferation of rumen microorganisms enabling more efficient digestion of the fiber components leading to higher feed intake (Ranjhan 1997).…”
Section: Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for T2, the result of this study is comparable with the findings of Butterworth and Mosi (1985) that reported a 29% increase in total DM intake when NSM was used as a supplement in tef straw based feeding of sheep. The improvement in total DM intake in the supplemented animals could be attributed to better supply of CP that promoted the proliferation of rumen microorganisms enabling more efficient digestion of the fiber components leading to higher feed intake (Ranjhan 1997).…”
Section: Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Supplementation reduced daily hay DM intake similar to the results of Butterworth and Mosi (1985) that reported 26.7% decline in the intake of the basal diet, tef straw, in sheep supplemented with 100 g NSM. Contrary to the current study, Bonsi et al (1996) reported that supplementation of sheep with cotton seed cake and Sesbania tended to enhance tef straw intake.…”
Section: Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The reduced intake of tef straw as the level of supplementation increased in this study might be due to the substitution of tef straw by the supplemented concentrate mix. The degree of depression in tef straw intake observed with the high level of supplementation in this study was similar to the value of 26.7% reported by Butterworth and Mosi (1985) when sheep were fed tef straw basal diet supplemented with 100 g NSC. Type and amount of supplement can affect substitution rate, and it has been generally accepted that substitution rate increases with the level of supplementation (Ponnampalam et al 2004).…”
Section: Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Butterworth and Mosi (1985) also reported improved total DM intake in sheep supplemented with NSC, though there was a decline in the intake of the basal diet. The reduced intake of tef straw as the level of supplementation increased in this study might be due to the substitution of tef straw by the supplemented concentrate mix.…”
Section: Feed Intakementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The higher OM digestibility after supplementation of US with CSC was due to higher CP levels in US coupled with lower lignin level (compared to H). Butterworth & Mosi (1986) and Alayu (1987) also reported increased digestibility of low quality roughages after protein supplementation. This increased digestibility could lead to higher productivity in terms of weight gain and wool growth as observed by Cronje & Weites (1990) when they supplemented wheat straw with cotton seed cake.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%