2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The integration of chronological and archaeological information to date building construction: an example from Shetland, Scotland, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method dates the most recent exposure of a mineral grain to sunlight, effectively fixing the time of burial. It is increasingly used to date sediments associated with archaeological structures such as stone rows and other installations where organic matter or artefacts are lacking (Porat et al 2006;Outram et al 2010;Feathers 2012). In the limestone terrain of the 'Uvda Valley, the only source of quartz is dust brought by seasonal strong winds.…”
Section: Osl Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method dates the most recent exposure of a mineral grain to sunlight, effectively fixing the time of burial. It is increasingly used to date sediments associated with archaeological structures such as stone rows and other installations where organic matter or artefacts are lacking (Porat et al 2006;Outram et al 2010;Feathers 2012). In the limestone terrain of the 'Uvda Valley, the only source of quartz is dust brought by seasonal strong winds.…”
Section: Osl Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, we apply luminescence dating to sediments beneath the rocks. There have been attempts to date soils beneath rocks on an ordinal scale based on degree of weathering (White 1998), but luminescence can achieve ratio-scale calendar estimates and has been applied in similar contexts in the Near East (Holzer et al 2010;Porat et al 2006), Europe (Outram et al 2010;Vafiadou et al 2007), and South America (Rink and Bartoll 2005). Luminescence dating of the underside of rocks and dating sediments underneath the rocks both have their own sets of problems and should be considered complementary approaches, rather than one being better than the other.…”
Section: Dating Stone Alignments Bymentioning
confidence: 99%