The Integration of Patient-Generated Health Data to Clinical Care

Rossetti, Sarah Collins; Tiase, Victoria

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07696-1_6

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding agrees with those of previous studies on the acceptance of health ICT, which reported that the digital readiness of clinicians had an impact on their acceptance of new medical technologies. 28 , 37 – 41 Also, this result confirms that positive experience and performance expectancy of technology affect users’ intention to adopt PGHD. 23 …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 69%

“…As reported in previous studies, the participants in this study identified data reliability as a very significant issue. 40 An efficient method for processing noisy data is vital to extract valuable insights. Equally crucial is the integration of PGHD into clinical workflows, accompanied by suitable incentives for the additional effort required in reviewing PGHD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Attitudes and perspectives of nurses and physicians in South Korea towards the clinical use of person-generated health data

Kim,

Cho,

Jung

et al. 2023

DIGITAL HEALTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to explore the adoption of person-generated health data in clinical settings and discern the factors influencing clinicians’ willingness to use it. A web-based survey containing 48 questions was developed based on prior research and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 model. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of 486 nurses and physicians in South Korea recruited through an online community and snowball sampling. Of these, 70.7% were physicians. While 65% had used mobile health apps and devices, only 12.8% were familiar with person-generated health data. Still, a promising 73.3% expressed interest in incorporating person-generated health data into patient care, particularly data on blood glucose and vital signs. The findings of the study also indicated that clinicians specializing in internal medicine (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.16–3.19), familiar with person-generated health data (OR: 2.6, CI: 1.58–4.29), with a positive view of information and communication technology adoption (OR: 2.6, CI: 1.65–4.13), and who see the value in person-generated health data (OR: 3.9, CI: 2.55–6.09) showed higher inclination to utilize it. However, those in outpatient settings (OR: 0.4, CI: 0.19–0.73) showed less enthusiasm. The findings of this study suggest that despite the willingness of clinicians to use person-generated health data, various barriers must be addressed first, including a lack of knowledge regarding its use, concerns about data reliability and quality, and a lack of provider incentives. Overcoming these challenges demands concerted organizational or policy support. This research underscores person-generated health data's untapped potential in healthcare and the pressing need for strategies that facilitate its clinical integration.

show abstract