1982
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Integrity of Independent Variables in Behavior Analysis

Abstract: Establishing a functional relationship between the independent and the dependent variable is the primary focus of applied behavior analysis. Accurate and reliable description and observation of both the independent and dependent variables are necessary to achieve this goal. Although considerable attention has been focused on ensuring the integrity of the dependent variable in the operant literature, similar effort has not been directed at ensuring the integrity of the independent variable. Inaccurate descripti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
323
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
323
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…'), that were interposed with other questions not directly related to treatment compliance. These methods served as checks on treatment integrity (Peterson et al, 1982).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'), that were interposed with other questions not directly related to treatment compliance. These methods served as checks on treatment integrity (Peterson et al, 1982).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peter Pipkin et al 2010;Vollmer et al 2008). The term treatment integrity describes the precision with which interventions are implemented (e.g., Peterson et al 1982). Treatment integrity is a measure of the correspondence between a behavior-change plan and the execution of that plan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergence from a treatment plan, whether intentional or not, may cause harm. Second, ensuring that treatments are implemented as described decreases the possibility of false-negative treatment outcomes (e.g., Hagermoser Sanetti and Fallon 2011; Peterson et al 1982;Vollmer et al 2008). Low treatment integrity may lead to erroneous conclusions about the effectiveness of a treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, assessments of social validity include not only the social importance of the behavior (i.e., the applied dimension) and the social significance of its effects (i.e., the effective dimension), but now also the social appropriateness of behavioral applications (Wolf, 1978). In addition, the behavioral dimension now often includes interobserver agreement on independent variables in what is called treatment integrity (see L. Peterson, Homer, & Wonderlich, 1982).…”
Section: Founding As a Processmentioning
confidence: 99%