The Intellectual Domains of Sustainability Leadership in SMEs

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to review the intertwined range of conceptualizations that have blurred developing leadership knowledge regarding environmental sustainability. An examination of the leadership literature reveals differential descriptions about sustainable, environmental, and sustainability leadership which are increasingly being used to imply what sustainability-focused leaders do, their interactions, their relationships, and how they address sustainable challenges. While extant research supports that leadership is a critical capability to respond and adapt to constant external environmental and economic upheaval in large firms, agreement about the types of leadership practices necessary to achieve positive environmental sustainability and eco-efficient outcomes is less clear in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). To resolve these problems, we synthesize the sustainable, environmental and sustainability leadership literature by (a) reviewing and clarifying these leadership constructs, (b) theoretically unravelling these overlapping concepts, and (c) developing an integrated framework of intellectual capital and sustainability leadership practices. From a theoretical perspective, this paper seeks to make a significant contribution to the scholarly leadership literature by offering several leadership classifications of skills and knowledge relevant to leadership knowledge domains. Given that extant research has conflated many leadership approaches, this paper builds on the theoretical knowledge of the kind of leadership skills required for sustainability leadership. From a practical perspective, we provide SME leaders with knowledge about the types of leadership practices, behaviours, and activities that will enhance sustainable productivity in their firms. The paper is designed to advance a new way of thinking about existing sustainability leadership by presenting an original contribution that alters and reorganizes potential causal maps, that are potentially more valuable. Whilst most of the leadership research involves large firms, we seek to better understand and inform sustainability leadership in SMEs.

Measuring opportunities: Transforming Indonesia’s economy through utilizing natural resources for sustainable development through green economy indicators

“…In general, SRI is related to investment in company shares or mutual fund products that are concerned with applying the principles of social, environmental, and business ethics. Investors who buy SRI products should understand how the company is managed before the investors buy their shares [10]. Socially responsible investment (SRI) is generally defined as an investment philosophy that combines ethical and moral considerations in addition to financial considerations.…”

Toward a System Theory of Corporate Sustainability: An Interim Struggle

“…The sustainability visions are composed of two components: Content and attributes [107]. Although the sustainability vision theory [107] has been internationally endorsed by various studies [108][109][110][111][112][113], it can still be refined as follow.…”

Drivers and barriers in developing sustainability leadership – a case of natural scientists at Ugandan universities

“…This conceptualisation of sustainability leadership goes beyond the traditional understanding of leadership in terms of position, person or role and rather locates leadership as a non-linear process of influencing people, teams and stakeholders towards shared goals and solving complex organisational and community problems (Boeske and Murray, 2022). Such collaborative, inclusive, soft-skills-based leadership is ideal for sustainability problems often characterised by unpredictability and adaptation (Ferdig, 2007; Hull et al , 2018).…”

“…There is growing evidence that designing and implementing sustainability strategies requires stellar leadership skills (Boeske and Murray, 2022;Burns et al, 2015;Cooney et al, 2022) and that the development of such skills deserves attention (Holmén et al, 2021;Leal Filho et al, 2019). This paper looks at sustainability from the perspective of human Natural scientists at Ugandan universities development, whereby individuals embody the capabilities needed to adapt, create and inspire the solving of complex challenges to make a better world (Boeske and Murray, 2022;Savage et al, 2015). The paper adopts Ferdig's (2007) view of a sustainability leader as anyone who takes responsibility to address sustainability challenges.…”