The intellectual structure of research in hospitality management: A literature review using bibliometric methods of the journal International Journal of Hospitality Management

Lillo, Francisco García; Úbeda‐García, Mercedes; Marco‐Lajara, Bartolomé

doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.007

Cited by 89 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Co-citation analysis has been widely adopted in the academic community as a valid method of studying the intellectual structure of a scientific discipline in many scientific areas (Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro, 2004) including tourism and hospitality (García-Lillo et al, 2016;Köseoglu et al, 2015). It examines the frequency of two publications cited in a pair as references represent the invisible development and relationship of research and signal their influences (Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro, 2004).…”

Section: Co-citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research

Cheng

2016

International Journal of Hospitality Management

749

502

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Co-citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research

Cheng

2016

International Journal of Hospitality Management

749

502

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…They identified 21 subjects as subdomains in the field and discussed the relationship between these subject areas and doctoral program distributions in tourism research. Additionally, and out of the scope of this current study's sample, several other studies have conducted relational studies in the tourism field (Benckendorff, 2009;Garcia-Lillo, Ubeda-Garcia, & Marco-Lajara, 2016;Ozel & Kozak, 2012).…”

Section: Studies Conducted Via Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric studies in tourism

Köseoğlu

Rahimi

Okumuş

et al. 2016

Annals of Tourism Research

438

260

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights This study evaluates progress on bibliometric studies in tourism. Systematic review studies emerged as the major group. Relatively few studies utilized evaluative and relational bibliometric studies. Samples of bibliometric studies were formed from articles mainly indexed by SSCI. The main implication is that unknown patterns have not been revealed. AbstractThis study evaluates bibliometric studies in tourism, depicts emerging themes, and offers critical discussions for theory development and future research. To achieve this aim, 190 papers with bibliometric analyses from leading hospitality and tourism journals were selected and critically analyzed. The research findings reveal that bibliometric articles published in these journals significantly increased after 2008. However, systematic review studies emerged as the major group, and relatively few studies utilized evaluative bibliometric and relational bibliometric studies. Study results suggest that paucity still exists, particularly in relational bibliometric studies in tourism. This is one of the first studies in this area that offers critical discussions and suggestions related to theory development and future research in this research vein.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, it is a well-recognized technique for conducting systematic analyses (van Raan 2005). This kind of research is common in different disciplines such as in industrial and pharmaceutical wastewater research (Zyoud et al 2016a, b), medicine (Zyoud et al 2015a), hospitality management (García-Lillo et al 2016), clinical research (Jain et al 2015), membrane science (Fu and Ho 2015), quality of water (Hu et al 2010), desalination research (Zyoud and Fuchs-Hanusch 2016) and toxicology research .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%