2012
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and Reliability of a Subjective Rating Measure

Abstract: The ICS is a promising new measure of functional intelligibility. These data provide initial support for the ICS as an easily administered, valid, and reliable estimate of preschool children's intelligibility when speaking with people of varying levels of familiarity and authority.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
179
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
179
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they have skills to identify their child's communication performance across a wide range of social contexts and are expected to provide a valid description of children's speech intelligibility (Hustad, 2012). To capitalize on parents' knowledge of children's functioning in context, McLeod, Harrison, and McCormack (2012) developed a parent questionnaire called Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS). The ICS was designed to obtain parents' opinions about their child's speech intelligibility when talking to different communication partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they have skills to identify their child's communication performance across a wide range of social contexts and are expected to provide a valid description of children's speech intelligibility (Hustad, 2012). To capitalize on parents' knowledge of children's functioning in context, McLeod, Harrison, and McCormack (2012) developed a parent questionnaire called Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS). The ICS was designed to obtain parents' opinions about their child's speech intelligibility when talking to different communication partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the children from the other age groups, which present more stable productions, the following method for reliability between transcriptions was used: all samples were transcribed by an experienced evaluator in child language and a second evaluator with the same experience transcribed, independently, 20% of the same sample for reliability (5,17) . There was a mean agreement of 79.6% at the 3-yr age groups; 81.9% for 4-yr groups; and 80.1% for 5-yr groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second judge with the same experience transcribed, independently, 20% of the same recording to certify the reliability (3,14) . In this way, the mean agreement was 79.6% by ages of three; 81.9% by ages of four; and 80.1% by ages of five.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%