2019
DOI: 10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inter-Rater Reliability of Measurements of Active Craniocervical Range of Motion With Smartphone in Patients With Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when measuring trunk AROM in clinical practice, both DG and SP are useful measuring tools available. According to a previous study, the smaller the SEM, the higher the reliability of the measurements [42,43]. In SEM, < 10% of the average score, and in MDC, < 20% of the highest score of the measured values have been reported…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, when measuring trunk AROM in clinical practice, both DG and SP are useful measuring tools available. According to a previous study, the smaller the SEM, the higher the reliability of the measurements [42,43]. In SEM, < 10% of the average score, and in MDC, < 20% of the highest score of the measured values have been reported…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[37] This is a reliable tool with inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.88-0.78). [38] Muscle tone was measured using a myotonometer. Muscle tone in the upper trapezius muscle was measured using a Myoton PRO (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%