2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction between cyanobacteria and zooplankton in a more eutrophic world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
195
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
5
195
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have also demonstrated that synergies between climate warming and increasing levels of humic substances in runoff are able to trigger an increase in cyanobacteria biomass [6], as well as a reduction in the biodiversity of phytoplankton [7,8]. Accordingly, both global and local scale adaptive management tools are important to manage future challenges related to water security and adequate functioning of freshwater ecosystems [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have also demonstrated that synergies between climate warming and increasing levels of humic substances in runoff are able to trigger an increase in cyanobacteria biomass [6], as well as a reduction in the biodiversity of phytoplankton [7,8]. Accordingly, both global and local scale adaptive management tools are important to manage future challenges related to water security and adequate functioning of freshwater ecosystems [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Compared with large-bodied cladocerans such as Daphnia of which grazing pressure is an important factor controlling algal biomass, small-bodied rotifers mainly consume the components of microbial loop and their high biomass often co-exist with algal blooms (Ger et al, 2016). Therefore, the decrease of small-bodied zooplankton with Cyanophyceae in nature-like fishway channel can be positive water treatment process removing the sources of suspended organic matter from surface river waters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that there was still quite some chlorophyll-a present, the suppressive effect of cladocerans on rotifers is probably via direct mechanical interference rather than exploitative competition [52]. Cladocera subsequently declined strongly, particularly in controls and solely LMB-treated enclosures, which was paralleled by a strong increase in cyanobacterial chlorophyll-a, demonstrating the well-reported negative effect of cyanobacteria on Cladocera [24,51]. Since Cladocera and other groups increased again in abundance towards the end of the experiment, while oxygen conditions had not clearly changed, the negative effects of low oxygen do not seem to be the most probable cause of their decline in controls and solely LMB-treated enclosures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A relatively low phosphate reduction of 35-40% has also been observed when lake water with an algal bloom was treated with LMB, where the authors pointed out that humic substance could have played a role [14]. Interference of humic substance with the phosphate-binding capacity of LMB has been confirmed experimentally [24,25,69]. The interference is kinetic; a humic substance forms a complex with La and hinders the contact between phosphate and La, thereby reducing the binding kinetics [25,26,69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%