2007
DOI: 10.1080/00207390601035302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction between intuitive and formal mathematical thinking: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example utilization of pictorial presentations might help to deduce simply and directly [41]. In a more general saying all kinds of relationships of a mathematical object can be apprehended easier and more rapidly due to visualization [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example utilization of pictorial presentations might help to deduce simply and directly [41]. In a more general saying all kinds of relationships of a mathematical object can be apprehended easier and more rapidly due to visualization [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above explanations, it could be drawn any conclusion within inquiry learning, student reasoning ability always be trained and thus, student math reasoning could upgrade through inquiry learning. According to Farmaki & Paschos (2007), through empirical materials of progressive mathematical, student could improve graphic representation models to manipulate images concept that could led them to fulfil their needs on formal math argumentation. This statement also signalled when someone conducted reasoning activity, then representation systems would work to produce any argument or conclusion.…”
Section: Relation Between the Guided Inquiry Learning With Reasoning mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to evaluate the mathematical reasoning process (Farmaki & Paschos, 2007;Fischbein, 1999;Lithner, 2008;Skemp, 1976;Wyndhamn & Saljö, 1997). In this paper, Lithner's framework was adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%