The Interaction between Nesprins and Sun Proteins at the Nuclear Envelope Is Critical for Force Transmission between the Nucleus and Cytoskeleton

126

129

Cells constantly sense and respond to mechanical signals by reorganizing their actin cytoskeleton. Although a number of studies have explored the effects of mechanical stimuli on actin dynamics, the immediate response of actin after force application has not been studied. We designed a method to monitor the spatiotemporal reorganization of actin after cell stimulation by local force application. We found that force could induce transient actin accumulation in the perinuclear region within ∼2 min. This actin reorganization was triggered by an intracellular Ca 2+ burst induced by force application. Treatment with the calcium ionophore A23187 recapitulated the force-induced perinuclear actin remodeling. Blocking of actin polymerization abolished this process. Overexpression of Klarsicht, ANC-1, Syne Homology (KASH) domain to displace nesprins from the nuclear envelope did not abolish Ca 2+ -dependent perinuclear actin assembly. However, the endoplasmic reticulum-and nuclear membrane-associated inverted formin-2 (INF2), a potent actin polymerization activator (mutations of which are associated with several genetic diseases), was found to be important for perinuclear actin assembly. The perinuclear actin rim structure colocalized with INF2 on stimulation, and INF2 depletion resulted in attenuation of the rim formation. Our study suggests that cells can respond rapidly to external force by remodeling perinuclear actin in a unique Ca 2+ -and INF2-dependent manner.force | mechanotransduction | calcium | formin | perinuclear actin rim C ells can sense and adapt to their physical microenvironment through specific mechanosensing mechanisms. These properties are often mediated by the actin cytoskeleton, which can be modulated by a wide range of forces. Fluid shear stress, for example, induces actin stress fiber assembly and realignment along the direction of flow (1-4), whereas the cyclic stretch of an elastic substrate induces a reorientation of stress fibers under some angle to the direction of stretch (5-8). Applying mechanical force to cells by a microneedle results in focal adhesion growth and activation of formin-type actin nucleators (9, 10). Similarly, local application of force through fibronectin or collagen-coated beads trapped by optical or magnetic tweezers leads to the local reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. This response is associated with reinforcement of bead attachment (11), recruitment of additional actin-associated proteins (12), and activation of a variety of signaling pathways (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Most studies to date have explored the effects of force on actin structures directly associated with the sites of force application, such as focal adhesions and stress fibers. However, the immediate effect of force on the assembly of actin structures distal from the sites of force application has not been assessed. Such process is despite distal effects having potential implications in the transduction of local forces from the cell periphery to nuclear events (18).In this study, we used a local mecha...

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical stimulation induces formin-dependent assembly of a perinuclear actin rim

Shao

Mogilner

et al. 2015

126

129

“…During neuronal migration, the nucleus is repeatedly pulled by microtubule-associated cytoplasmic motors toward the centrosome near the leading edge of the cell (nucleokinesis) (38,39). The microtubule network almost certainly binds to the cell nucleus through interactions with LINC complex (involving SUN1/2 and Nesprin-1/2) (40,41), and this same complex likely binds to the nuclear lamina (40,42). We suspect that the dumbbell-shaped nuclei and naked chromatin in migrating Lmnb1 CS/CS neurons are a consequence of weakened interactions between the nuclear lamina and the inner nuclear membrane (Fig.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Farnesylation of lamin B1 is important for retention of nuclear chromatin during neuronal migration

Jung¹,

Nobumori²,

Goulbourne³

et al. 2013

The role of protein farnesylation in lamin A biogenesis and the pathogenesis of progeria has been studied in considerable detail, but the importance of farnesylation for the B-type lamins, lamin B1 and lamin B2, has received little attention. Lamins B1 and B2 are expressed in nearly every cell type from the earliest stages of development, and they have been implicated in a variety of functions within the cell nucleus. To assess the importance of protein farnesylation for B-type lamins, we created knock-in mice expressing nonfarnesylated versions of lamin B1 and lamin B2. Mice expressing nonfarnesylated lamin B2 developed normally and were free of disease. In contrast, mice expressing nonfarnesylated lamin B1 died soon after birth, with severe neurodevelopmental defects and striking nuclear abnormalities in neurons. The nuclear lamina in migrating neurons was pulled away from the chromatin so that the chromatin was left "naked" (free from the nuclear lamina). Thus, farnesylation of lamin B1-but not lamin B2-is crucial for brain development and for retaining chromatin within the bounds of the nuclear lamina during neuronal migration.genetically modified mouse models T he nuclear lamina is an intermediate filament meshwork that lies beneath the inner nuclear membrane. This lamina provides structural support for the nucleus and also interacts with nuclear proteins and chromatin, thereby affecting many functions within the cell nucleus (1, 2). In mammals, the main protein components of the nuclear lamina are lamins A and C (A-type lamins) and lamins B1 and B2 (B-type lamins).Both B-type lamins and prelamin A (the precursor of lamin A) terminate with a CaaX motif, which triggers three posttranslational modifications (3-5): farnesylation of the carboxyl-terminal cysteine (the "C" in the CaaX motif) (6), endoproteolytic cleavage of the last three amino acids (the -aaX) (7,8), and carboxyl methylation of the newly exposed farnesylcysteine (9, 10). Prelamin A undergoes a second endoproteolytic cleavage event, mediated by zinc metalloproteinase STE24 (ZMPSTE24), which removes 15 additional amino acids from the carboxyl terminus, including the farnesylcysteine methyl ester (11)(12)(13)(14). Lamins B1 and B2 do not undergo the second cleavage step and therefore retain their farnesyl lipid anchor.The discovery that Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is caused by a LMNA mutation yielding an internally truncated farnesyl-prelamin A (15) has focused interest in the farnesylation of nuclear lamins. This interest has been fueled by the finding that disease phenotypes in mouse models of HGPS could be ameliorated by blocking protein farnesylation with a protein farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) (16)(17)(18)(19). Most recently, children with HGPS seemed to show a positive response to FTI treatment (20).The prospect of using an FTI to treat children with HGPS naturally raises the issue of the importance of protein farnesylation for lamin B1 and lamin B2. The B-type lamins are expressed in all mammalian cells and have been h...

“…Actin is physically linked to the nucleus via nesprin, which is a component of the LINC complex (49). To understand whether this physical link is necessary for nuclear deformability, cells were transfected with dominant negative (DN)-KASH fused with GFP, which displaces the endogenous nesprin from the nuclear envelope to the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby disrupting the LINC complex (50). These cells were then cultured on CI fibronectin micropatterns, and time lapse imaging of H2B-mRFP labeled nuclei was performed in cells expressing DN-KASH GFP ( Fig.…”

Section: Linc Complex and Microtubules Affect Amplitude Of Nuclear Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Nuclear deformability and telomere dynamics are regulated by cell geometric constraints

Makhija

Jokhun

Shivashankar

2015

192

186

Forces generated by the cytoskeleton can be transmitted to the nucleus and chromatin via physical links on the nuclear envelope and the lamin meshwork. Although the role of these active forces in modulating prestressed nuclear morphology has been well studied, the effect on nuclear and chromatin dynamics remains to be explored. To understand the regulation of nuclear deformability by these active forces, we created different cytoskeletal states in mouse fibroblasts using micropatterned substrates. We observed that constrained and isotropic cells, which lack long actin stress fibers, have more deformable nuclei than elongated and polarized cells. This nuclear deformability altered in response to actin, myosin, formin perturbations, or a transcriptional down-regulation of lamin A/C levels in the constrained and isotropic geometry. Furthermore, to probe the effect of active cytoskeletal forces on chromatin dynamics, we tracked the spatiotemporal dynamics of heterochromatin foci and telomeres. We observed increased dynamics and decreased correlation of the heterochromatin foci and telomere trajectories in constrained and isotropic cell geometry. The observed enhanced dynamics upon treatment with actin depolymerizing reagents in elongated and polarized geometry were regained once the reagent was washed off, suggesting an inherent structural memory in chromatin organization. We conclude that active forces from the cytoskeleton and rigidity from lamin A/C nucleoskeleton can together regulate nuclear and chromatin dynamics. Because chromatin remodeling is a necessary step in transcription control and its memory, genome integrity, and cellular deformability during migration, our results highlight the importance of cell geometric constraints as critical regulators in cell behavior. mechanotransduction | cell geometry | actomyosin contractility | chromatin dynamics | telomere dynamics P hysical properties of the nucleus, such as its morphology and deformability, have been associated with important cellular functions like gene expression, genome integrity, and cell behavior (1-3). The major cellular components that regulate these physical properties are the cytoskeleton to nuclear links and the nuclear lamina (4-8). Lineage-specific physical properties of the nucleus emerge during cellular differentiation; although stem cell nuclei are highly deformable (9, 10) and have a dynamic chromatin with hyperdynamic chromatin proteins (11), with differentiation, nuclei lose their deformability and become less deformable (12). The nucleus in a differentiated cell is physically coupled to the cytoskeleton via lamins and the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which comprises transmembrane Sad1p, UNC-84 (SUN) and Klarsicht, ANC-1, Syne Homology (KASH) domain proteins (13-18). Any perturbation to these components is linked to changes in nuclear morphology and deformability (19). Therefore, the meshwork of actin stress fibers and lamin A/C serves as a critical physical intermediate in the maintenance of nuclear func...