2018
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1407790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interaction Between Punishment Sensitivity and Effortful Control for Emerging Adults' Substance Use Behaviors

Abstract: The current findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting the dual systems theorized to influence risk taking behavior interact to make joint contributions to health risk behaviors such as substance use in emerging adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a typical delayed discounting task, participants would face a choice of an immediate but smaller reward versus a later but larger reward (Frederick et al 2002). Substance addicts often exhibit high reward sensitivity and low punishment sensitivity in conjunction with deficits in executive control, which may contribute to high levels of risk-taking behaviors (Kahn et al 2018).…”
Section: Results From Decision-making Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical delayed discounting task, participants would face a choice of an immediate but smaller reward versus a later but larger reward (Frederick et al 2002). Substance addicts often exhibit high reward sensitivity and low punishment sensitivity in conjunction with deficits in executive control, which may contribute to high levels of risk-taking behaviors (Kahn et al 2018).…”
Section: Results From Decision-making Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it would be interesting to distinguish between the three components of EC (attentional control, inhibitory control, and activation control) in both internalizing and externalizing disorders, in most studies, however, the total sum of EC is used since the general concept of EC is of interest [27] and the alpha coefficients of the subscales are often too low, indicating that they are less reliable than the total score [28]. We only found three studies where analyses were made with the three subcomponents of the EC [23,79,87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in a study by the same group, EC exhibited a protective effect, reducing the effects of alcohol intoxication on the likelihood of unprotected intercourse [78]. In a large (n = 188) study among university students, Kahn et al [79] investigated whether components of EC serve unique roles in moderating the link between reward and punishment sensitivity and substance use behaviors. In this study of emerging adults, inhibitory control (ATQ measured) was the only component of EC that emerged as a significant moderator.…”
Section: Ec and Sudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executive control refers to the ability of individuals to successfully inhibit improper behavior or thoughts in complex environments [11], of which the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are important components [12,13]. Addicts often exhibit high reward sensitivity and low loss sensitivity in conjunction with deficits in executive control, which may contribute to high levels of risk behaviors [14]. For example, IGD individuals cannot control gaming behavior despite clearly understanding the negative effects, and choose to indulge in instant pleasure [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%