1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.868738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of a shock with a vortex: Shock distortion and the production of acoustic waves

Abstract: Numerical simulations of a shock interacting with a compressible vortex are presented for shocks and vortices of various relative strengths. The simulations show the effects of the vortex on the shock structure and the structure of the acoustic field generated by the shock–vortex interaction. A relatively weak vortex perturbs the transmitted shock only slightly, whereas a strong vortex leaves the transmitted shock with a structure corresponding to either a regular or Mach reflection. The acoustic wave generate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
72
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 The reflected shock waves from the upper 10 and lower walls of the ejector interact with the two vortex cores and their propagation is altered, an observation consistent with Ellzey et al 55 Focusing on the lower vortex core which is rotating clockwise, we notice that the portion of the reflected shock wave to the right of the core travels more slowly; at the same time the portion of the reflected shock to the left of the core, which has just been reflected from the underside of the nozzle is also slowed down. The shock wave splitting phenomenon produces secondary shock waves which add to the complexity of our already intricate flow.…”
Section: Diffraction Regionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…54 The reflected shock waves from the upper 10 and lower walls of the ejector interact with the two vortex cores and their propagation is altered, an observation consistent with Ellzey et al 55 Focusing on the lower vortex core which is rotating clockwise, we notice that the portion of the reflected shock wave to the right of the core travels more slowly; at the same time the portion of the reflected shock to the left of the core, which has just been reflected from the underside of the nozzle is also slowed down. The shock wave splitting phenomenon produces secondary shock waves which add to the complexity of our already intricate flow.…”
Section: Diffraction Regionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…43 These authors simulated the test problem at very low Reynolds numbers using Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). The effects of the Reynolds number on the physical phenomena taking place during the shock-vortex interaction were found to be very small, which is also supported by good comparisons 42 between results obtained from DNS and from the Euler simulations performed by Ellzey et al 51 for slightly different flow parameters. This led us to compute the shock-vortex problem from the 2-D Euler equations (3) …”
Section: Shock-vortex Interactionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It has been extensively studied experimentally (e.g. Dosanjh and Weeks [1965], Cattafesta and Settles [1992], Chang et al [2004]), analytically (Ribner [1954a(Ribner [ , 1985, Mahesh et al [1997]) and numerically (Ellzey et al [1995], Inoue and Hattori [1999], Dexun and Yanwen [2001]), with a particular emphasis on the noise production through the interaction. The passage of large coherent vortices through compression wave contributes significantly to the shock-associated noise that is found in jet engines.…”
Section: Shock / Vortex Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their behavior is typical of the quadrupolar nature of the phenomenon. The angular variations of the normalized pressure difference (P2 -Pp)/P s ) is then computed and compared to experimental and other numerical (Ellzey et al [1995], Inoue and Hattori [1999])…”
Section: P(r) = Pjl-^-±my-and T(r)=t U (L-^-±my-£mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation