“…Nevertheless, in some of the MLST genes analyzed here, the observed values of ω and n M are so high that it is hard to believe that LRTs are completely misleading in their conclusions, especially for M7-M8 comparisons (e.g., N. gonorrhoeae and S. agalactiae). Moreover, it has been shown that LRTs are conservative (Anisimova et al, 2001(Anisimova et al, ,2003Yang et al, 2000a), so genes inferred by the test to undergo positive selection are most likely true cases of adaptation rather than an artifact of the method, as proven in most of the published studies (e.g., Bishop et al, 2000;Peek et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2000b;Yang and Swanson, 2002). Besides, we have adopted an even more conservative approach since we are not considering the loci under significant positive selection for which positively selected sites were not identified.…”