1988
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of target size and background pattern on perceived velocity during visual tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…w 4 are weights specific to the respective velocities, JO is the judged object, and OO is the other object. The velocities are perceived velocities, which may or may not be isomorphic with objective velocities (J. F. Brown, 1931;Raymond, 1988). According to the mechanoreceptor hypothesis, u JO should carry more weight than v OO , and the other two velocities should carry negligible weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w 4 are weights specific to the respective velocities, JO is the judged object, and OO is the other object. The velocities are perceived velocities, which may or may not be isomorphic with objective velocities (J. F. Brown, 1931;Raymond, 1988). According to the mechanoreceptor hypothesis, u JO should carry more weight than v OO , and the other two velocities should carry negligible weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reason for this discrepancy is unclear, it may well be related to the lack of background contours in laboratory-based scaling efforts. Judged velocity is greater when a target moves across a contoured, as opposed to a featureless, background (Raymond, 1988). This contour effect is probably mediated by several mechanisms, including optokinetic nystagmus (OKN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, two-dimensional presentations often minimize the need for pursuit eye movements. To the extent that information from eye movements is used in estimating velocity, the minimization of eye movements may lead to systematic changes in perceived velocity (Dichgans, Korner, & Voight, 1969; Raymond, 1988). In fact, the average slope 1 in the Scialfa et al (1987) data was 0.68, considerably below that found in three-dimensional scaling studies and similar to the exponents reported when eye movements to track the target are largely unnecessary (e.g., using small visual fields).…”
Section: Speed Estimation and Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%