2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of TraW and TrbC is required to facilitate conjugation in F-like plasmids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since two‐hybrid systems can give both false‐negative and false‐positive results, we aimed to further validate our findings with other methods. For many of the interactions observed in this study, some evidence for the interaction between the studied proteins or homologs from other T4SSs can be found in the literature (Das et al ., 1997; Das and Xie, 2000; Gilmour et al ., 2001; Harris et al ., 2001; Ding et al ., 2002; Harris and Silverman, 2004; Chandran et al ., 2009; Fronzes et al ., 2009; Sivanesan et al ., 2010; Low et al ., 2014; Ramsey et al ., 2014; Casu et al ., 2016; Oliveira et al ., 2016; Shala‐Lawrence et al ., 2018; Hu et al ., 2019). However, only limited evidence exists for interactions between OMCC proteins homologs (TraB, TraV, and TraK) and F‐type‐specific periplasmic proteins (Arutyunov et al ., 2010), and the function of the F‐type‐specific periplasmic proteins is poorly understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since two‐hybrid systems can give both false‐negative and false‐positive results, we aimed to further validate our findings with other methods. For many of the interactions observed in this study, some evidence for the interaction between the studied proteins or homologs from other T4SSs can be found in the literature (Das et al ., 1997; Das and Xie, 2000; Gilmour et al ., 2001; Harris et al ., 2001; Ding et al ., 2002; Harris and Silverman, 2004; Chandran et al ., 2009; Fronzes et al ., 2009; Sivanesan et al ., 2010; Low et al ., 2014; Ramsey et al ., 2014; Casu et al ., 2016; Oliveira et al ., 2016; Shala‐Lawrence et al ., 2018; Hu et al ., 2019). However, only limited evidence exists for interactions between OMCC proteins homologs (TraB, TraV, and TraK) and F‐type‐specific periplasmic proteins (Arutyunov et al ., 2010), and the function of the F‐type‐specific periplasmic proteins is poorly understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For periplasmic proteins cloned only in the BACTH‐TM system, we observed interactions between TraW and TrbC from both the N. gonorrhoeae T4SS and the F‐plasmid T4SS. In several F‐type T4SSs, TrbC proteins are fused to the N‐terminus of TraW, and TrbC F and TraW F were found to co‐purify, indicating that the TraW/TrbC interaction is important for F‐type T4SSs (Shala‐Lawrence et al ., 2018). These results indicate that BACTH‐TM system can be used successfully to study periplasmic protein interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that TraW plays an essential role in the pilus extension process; however, its protein interactions are not fully understood. It is hypothesized that TraW interacts with its neighboring protein TrbC [ 97 ].…”
Section: Structures Involved In Pilin Processing Pilus Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both TraW and TrbC are very similar in their localization and function, and in some systems, these proteins are expressed as a single polypeptide, indicating that cooperative function may occur between TraW and TrbC. Previous studies performed using conjugative mating assays showed that an interaction between the NTD of TraW and the CTD of TrbC was essential for conjugation to occur [ 97 ]. It is possible that this same interaction is required for the assembly of the pilus.…”
Section: Structures Involved In Pilin Processing Pilus Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation