1988
DOI: 10.13182/nt88-a34115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intercomparison of Aerosol Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More sophisticated numerical methods can certainly be developed for the conservative form of the kinetic aerosol equation. For example, linear finite element methods have been developed for the nonconservative form of the equation (Dunbar (1984)), and there is no doubt that these can be systematically developed for the conservative form of the equation. However, we will not pursue this here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More sophisticated numerical methods can certainly be developed for the conservative form of the kinetic aerosol equation. For example, linear finite element methods have been developed for the nonconservative form of the equation (Dunbar (1984)), and there is no doubt that these can be systematically developed for the conservative form of the equation. However, we will not pursue this here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we summarize the numerical method employed in the Pardiseko code (Dunbar (1984), Bunz (1984)). To begin, let us divide the volume range into I cells whose widths vary logarithmically.…”
Section: Finite Difference Methods (Pardiseko)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation