2022
DOI: 10.31464/jlere.1024616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit for Turkish Speakers of English

Abstract: This study is aimed at investigating the Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit (ISIB) via native English and Turkish listeners’ transcriptions of Turkish talkers’ words with pronunciation errors in English. Speech samples collected from talkers with a Turkish L1 background (N=16) were presented to 33 L1 English and 33 L1 Turkish listeners via an instrument to be filled with the transcriptions of erroneous target words. Results supported matched ISIB for listeners as Turkish talkers were more intelligibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the evidence, the major purpose of this paper is to see whether the perception of L2 English segments, which do not exist as a phoneme in the L1 inventory is ever possible. Previous studies have looked at L1 Turkish speakers' learning L2 English segments (e.g., Demirezen, 2005Demirezen, , 2007Demirezen, , 2008Hişmanoğlu, 2007;Hismanoglu, 2009;Kahraman, 2012Kahraman, , 2013Şimşek & Karal, 2014) and performance on their production (e.g., Bardakçı, 2015;Mahzoun & Han, 2019;Uzun, 2022b). The present study bears significance in contributing to existing research from a more cognitive-perceptual perspective by using a forced choice paper-based task.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Based on the evidence, the major purpose of this paper is to see whether the perception of L2 English segments, which do not exist as a phoneme in the L1 inventory is ever possible. Previous studies have looked at L1 Turkish speakers' learning L2 English segments (e.g., Demirezen, 2005Demirezen, , 2007Demirezen, , 2008Hişmanoğlu, 2007;Hismanoglu, 2009;Kahraman, 2012Kahraman, , 2013Şimşek & Karal, 2014) and performance on their production (e.g., Bardakçı, 2015;Mahzoun & Han, 2019;Uzun, 2022b). The present study bears significance in contributing to existing research from a more cognitive-perceptual perspective by using a forced choice paper-based task.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Several studies explored linguistic factors that affect speech intelligibility. Some highlighted the importance of segmentals in this regard (e.g., Bent et al, 2007;Cunningham, 2009;Im & Levis, 2015;Jin & Liu, 2014;Levis & Barriuso, 2012;Uzun, 2022a), while others pointed to the importance of suprasegmentals like prosody and syllable structure (Anderson-Hsieh et al, 1992) and word stress (Field, 2005;Hahn, 2004, Lewis & Deterding, 2018Richards, 2016).…”
Section: 2intelligibility Comprehensibility and Foreign Accentmentioning
confidence: 99%