The Internal Migration of Immigrants: Differences between One‐Time and Multiple Movers in Spain

Abstract

Research on the mobility and residential patterns of immigrants within receiving countries is abundant. The selective nature of movers and the location of immigrants are issues that have received special attention. Most studies are premised on the supposition that immigrants move only once. However, for a number of immigrants, internal migration is a dynamic process in which more than one movement is involved. This article extends the literature by disaggregating immigrants according to their number of internal migrations. We use data from a new and rich retrospective survey to examine the determinants of migration trajectories and the effects of the location choices of immigrants. We elaborate a set of indicators to assess the importance of the spatial assimilation theory and other main theoretical frameworks. This article concentrates on Spain, a recent main migratory destination in Europe and worldwide. Results reveal the existence of significant differences between one‐time and multiple movers. The selective nature of multiple movers is explained in part by the spatial assimilation paradigm. Further results show that both one‐time and multiple movers tend to reside outside ethnic concentrations as a result of their mobility experience within Spain. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Prospects for Irish regions and counties: scenarios and implications

“…Using Spanish data, Silvestre and Reher (2014) show that the multiple movers tend not to reside in centres with high concentrations of ethnic groups. They also found that multiple movers tended to be younger and more educated but also more likely to be unemployed.…”

Exiting distressed neighbourhoods: The timing of spatial assimilation among international migrants in Sweden

“…The latter contends that migrants do not necessarily aspire to move to wealthier areas and that there are advantages in residing among coethnics. These theories have mainly been tested in the North American context, but the number of European studies on the subject is steadily growing (e.g., Bolt & van Kempen, ; Feng, van Ham, Boyle, & Raab, ; Lersch, ; Schaake, Burgers, & Mulder, ; Silvestre & Reher, ; Skifter Andersen, , ; Valk & Willaert, ). The literature contains a large variety of results, with some studies showing evidence of each of the theories as well as the coexistence of multiple theories, depending on the ethnic group (Bolt & van Kempen, ; Skovgaard Nielsen, ).…”

Types of spatial mobility and change in people's ethnic residential contexts

“…in Denmark: Damm 2004), the preferred choices of all immigrants upon arrival tend to be major urban centres. Even though there are few studies on the long-distance migration of ethnic minority groups (see Finney and Simpson 2008;Simpson and Finney 2009;Silvestre and Reher 2014;Tammaru and Kontuly 2011), these studies do show that when an ethnic group has lived in a country for a long period of time, the members of this group develop contacts with the majority population and other ethnic groups, and some of them then start to move to other parts of that country. Because the destinations, e.g., cities and towns in less urban and more rural areas, usually have fewer minorities it has been suggested that moving away from major cities thus increases ethnic residential integration (Simpson and Finney 2009).…”