1991
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90114-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The internal reference technique in microdialysis: A practical approach to monitoring dialysis efficiency and to calculating tissue concentration from dialysate samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
190
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…over the membrane was determined for each dialysate sample (49). The dialysate (3 l) was pipetted into a counting vial in duplicates and mixed with 3 ml scintillation fluid (Ultima Gold, Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA), and the samples were counted in a ␤-counter.…”
Section: Experimental Protocol and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…over the membrane was determined for each dialysate sample (49). The dialysate (3 l) was pipetted into a counting vial in duplicates and mixed with 3 ml scintillation fluid (Ultima Gold, Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA), and the samples were counted in a ␤-counter.…”
Section: Experimental Protocol and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The microdialysis catheters were perfused at a rate of 2 l/min with Ringer acetate or NSAID solution containing radioactively labeled prostaglandin E 2 (PGE2) for relative recovery determination (14). Two different types of microdialysis catheters were used (both with a membrane length of 30 mm): custom-made, linear catheters with 3,000-kDa molecular mass cutoff (8) or commercially available CMA catheters (CMA 60; CMA/microdialysis, Solna, Sweden) with 20-kDa molecular mass cutoff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five microliters of dialysate from each sample was pipetted into a counting vial, 5 ml of scintillation fluid (Ultima Gold; PerkinElmer) was added, and the sample was counted in a beta counter. The RR from the interstitial fluid to the perfusate is assumed to equal the relative loss of labeled substance from the interstitium (20). Accordingly, the RR was calculated for each location as follows:…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%